The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithms for Detecting Significantly Mutated Pathways in Cancer
Abstract
Recent genome sequencing studies have shown that the somatic mutations that drive cancer development are distributed across a large number of genes. This mutational heterogeneity complicates efforts to distinguish functional mutations from sporadic, passenger mutations. Since cancer mutations are hypothesized to target a relatively small number of cellular signaling and regulatory pathways, a common practice is to assess whether known pathways are enriched for mutated genes. We introduce an alternative approach that examines mutated genes in the context of a genome-scale gene interaction network. We present a computationally efficient strategy for de novo identification of subnetworks in an interaction network that are mutated in a statistically significant number of patients. This framework includes two major components. First, we use a diffusion process on the interaction network to define a local neighborhood of "influence" for each mutated gene in the network. Second, we derive a two-stage multiple hypothesis test to bound the false discovery rate (FDR) associated with the identified subnetworks. We test these algorithms on a large human protein-protein interaction network using somatic mutation data from glioblastoma and lung adenocarcinoma samples. We successfully recover pathways that are known to be important in these cancers and also identify additional pathways that have been implicated in other cancers but not previously reported as mutated in these samples. We anticipate that our approach will find increasing use as cancer genome studies increase in size and scope.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme
Parsons, D. W., Jones, S., Zhang, X., Lin, J. C.-H., Leary, R. J., Angenendt, P., Mankoo, P., Carter, H., Siu, I.-M., Gallia, G. L., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164382 · Cited by 5,857
Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma
Ding, L., Getz, G., Wheeler, D. A., Mardis, E. R., McLellan, M. D., Cibulskis, K., Sougnez, C., Greulich, H., Muzny, D. M., Morgan, M. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07423 · Cited by 2,681
Network‐based classification of breast cancer metastasis
Chuang, H., Lee, E., Liu, Y., Lee, D., & Ideker, T. (2007) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100180 · Cited by 1,431
Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks
Ideker, T., Ozier, O., Schwikowski, B., & Siegel, A. F. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s233 · Cited by 1,197
Cited by
Genomic and Epigenomic Landscapes of Adult De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301689 · Cited by 5,078
Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12222 · Cited by 3,485
Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks
Mitra, K., Carvunis, A.-R., Ramesh, S. K., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3552 · Cited by 535
Methods for the integration of multi-omics data: mathematical aspects
Bersanelli, M., Mosca, E., Remondini, D., Giampieri, E., Sala, C., Castellani, G., & Milanesi, L. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0857-9 · Cited by 449
Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies
Tusi, B. K., Wolock, S. L., Weinreb, C., Hwang, Y., Hidalgo, D., Zilionis, R., Waisman, A., Huh, J. R., Klein, A. M., & Socolovsky, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25741 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandin, F., Upfal, E., & Raphael, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-522
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W2095319945
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algorithms for Detecting Significantly Mutated Pathways in Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cmb.2010.0265
- The paper
- Vandin, F., Upfal, E., & Raphael, B. J. (2011). Algorithms for Detecting Significantly Mutated Pathways in Cancer. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2010.0265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.