Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Computational-Based Method for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions by Using Stacked Autoencoder Deep Neural Network

Wang, Lei, You, Zhu-Hong, Chen, Xing, Xia, Shi-Xiong, Liu, Feng, Yan, Xin, Zhou, Yong, Song, Ke-Jian·2018·Journal of Computational Biology

Abstract

Identifying the interaction between drugs and target proteins is an important area of drug research, which provides a broad prospect for low-risk and faster drug development. However, due to the limitations of traditional experiments when revealing drug-protein interactions (DTIs), the screening of targets not only takes a lot of time and money but also has high false-positive and false-negative rates. Therefore, it is imperative to develop effective automatic computational methods to accurately predict DTIs in the postgenome era. In this article, we propose a new computational method for predicting DTIs from drug molecular structure and protein sequence by using the stacked autoencoder of deep learning, which can adequately extract the raw data information. The proposed method has the advantage that it can automatically mine the hidden information from protein sequences and generate highly representative features through iterations of multiple layers. The feature descriptors are then constructed by combining the molecular substructure fingerprint information, and fed into the rotation forest for accurate prediction. The experimental results of fivefold cross-validation indicate that the proposed method achieves superior performance on gold standard data sets (enzymes, ion channels, GPCRs [G-protein-coupled receptors], and nuclear receptors) with accuracy of 0.9414, 0.9116, 0.8669, and 0.8056, respectively. We further comprehensively explore the performance of the proposed method by comparing it with other feature extraction algorithms, state-of-the-art classifiers, and other excellent methods on the same data set. The excellent comparison results demonstrate that the proposed method is highly competitive when predicting drug-target interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cmb.2017.0135

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., You, Z.-H., Chen, X., Xia, S.-X., Liu, F., Yan, X., Zhou, Y., & Song, K.-J.
Venue
Journal of Computational Biology
Published
2018-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
361-373
ISSN
  • 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8666
OpenAlex
W2754595644
Cited by
188
References
6
FWCI
11.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Computational-Based Method for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions by Using Stacked Autoencoder Deep Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cmb.2017.0135
The paper
Wang, L., You, Z.-H., Chen, X., Xia, S.-X., Liu, F., Yan, X., Zhou, Y., & Song, K.-J. (2018). A Computational-Based Method for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions by Using Stacked Autoencoder Deep Neural Network. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2017.0135

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.