The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Computational-Based Method for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions by Using Stacked Autoencoder Deep Neural Network
Abstract
Identifying the interaction between drugs and target proteins is an important area of drug research, which provides a broad prospect for low-risk and faster drug development. However, due to the limitations of traditional experiments when revealing drug-protein interactions (DTIs), the screening of targets not only takes a lot of time and money but also has high false-positive and false-negative rates. Therefore, it is imperative to develop effective automatic computational methods to accurately predict DTIs in the postgenome era. In this article, we propose a new computational method for predicting DTIs from drug molecular structure and protein sequence by using the stacked autoencoder of deep learning, which can adequately extract the raw data information. The proposed method has the advantage that it can automatically mine the hidden information from protein sequences and generate highly representative features through iterations of multiple layers. The feature descriptors are then constructed by combining the molecular substructure fingerprint information, and fed into the rotation forest for accurate prediction. The experimental results of fivefold cross-validation indicate that the proposed method achieves superior performance on gold standard data sets (enzymes, ion channels, GPCRs [G-protein-coupled receptors], and nuclear receptors) with accuracy of 0.9414, 0.9116, 0.8669, and 0.8056, respectively. We further comprehensively explore the performance of the proposed method by comparing it with other feature extraction algorithms, state-of-the-art classifiers, and other excellent methods on the same data set. The excellent comparison results demonstrate that the proposed method is highly competitive when predicting drug-target interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
Kola, I., & Landis, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1470 · Cited by 4,167
How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge
Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566
Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs
Keiser, M. J., Setola, V., Irwin, J. J., Laggner, C., Abbas, A. I., Hufeisen, S. J., Jensen, N. H., Kuijer, M. B., Matos, R. C., Tran, T. B., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08506 · Cited by 1,667
Drug–target interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models
Chen, X., Yan, C. C., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Dai, F., Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv066 · Cited by 658
Self-citationSuperTarget and Matador: resources for exploring drug-target relationships
Gunther, S., Kuhn, M., Dunkel, M., Campillos, M., Senger, C., Petsalaki, E., Ahmed, J., Urdiales, E. G., Gewiess, A., Jensen, L. J., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm862 · Cited by 647 · cited 1×
“In the experiments, we used the data about the interactions between drugs and target proteins from SuperTarget (Gunther et al., 2008), DrugBank (Wishart et al., 2008), KEGG BRITE (Kanehisa et al., 2006), and BRENDA (Schomburg et al., 2004) databases collected by Yamanishi et al. (2008).”
Cited by
Machine learning approaches and databases for prediction of drug–target interaction: a survey paper
Bagherian, M., Sabeti, E., Wang, K., Sartor, M. A., Nikolovska-Coleska, Z., & Najarian, K. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz157 · Cited by 429
Wang, R., Li, S., Cheng, L., Wong, M. H., & Leung, K. S. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3283-6 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., You, Z.-H., Chen, X., Xia, S.-X., Liu, F., Yan, X., Zhou, Y., & Song, K.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-373
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W2754595644
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Computational-Based Method for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions by Using Stacked Autoencoder Deep Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cmb.2017.0135
- The paper
- Wang, L., You, Z.-H., Chen, X., Xia, S.-X., Liu, F., Yan, X., Zhou, Y., & Song, K.-J. (2018). A Computational-Based Method for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions by Using Stacked Autoencoder Deep Neural Network. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2017.0135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.