CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 510Impact of Technology on AdolescentsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facebook Friends with (Health) Benefits? Exploring Social Network Site Use and Perceptions of Social Support, Stress, and Well-Being

Nabi, Robin L., Prestin, Abby, So, Jiyeon·2013·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0521
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is clear evidence that interpersonal social support impacts stress levels and, in turn, degree of physical illness and psychological well-being. This study examines whether mediated social networks serve the same palliative function. A survey of 401 undergraduate Facebook users revealed that, as predicted, number of Facebook friends associated with stronger perceptions of social support, which in turn associated with reduced stress, and in turn less physical illness and greater well-being. This effect was minimized when interpersonal network size was taken into consideration. However, for those who have experienced many objective life stressors, the number of Facebook friends emerged as the stronger predictor of perceived social support. The "more-friends-the-better" heuristic is proposed as the most likely explanation for these findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2012.0521

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sarason BR, 1997, Handbook of personal relationships, 547

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–509 of 509

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Nabi, Robin L.
ORCID
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2013-10
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
721-727
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
DOI
10.1089/cyber.2012.0521
OpenAlex
W2055176445
Cited by
510
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 1
FWCI
74.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
Facebook, social network sites, perceived social support, stress, well-being, physical illness, number of friends, network size, life events, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Data Collection, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Psychological Tests, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Friends, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review