Cited by 131Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and PsychologyMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-Concept Clarity and Online Self-Presentation in Adolescents

Open access
Fullwood, Chris, James, Billie May, Chen-Wilson, Chao-Hwa (Josephine)·2016·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

The Internet may be conceptualized as a social laboratory, providing freedom to experiment with different presentations of self. Adolescence is an important time in the development of self-concept; however, little is known about how clarity of self-concept relates to online behavior. The principal aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that self-concept clarity would be associated with adolescents' inclination to experiment with online self-presentation. One hundred forty-eight participants aged 13–18 completed the Self-Concept Clarity Scale, the Facebook Intensity Scale, and the Presentation of Online Self Scale (POSS). Adolescents possessing a less stable sense of self reported experimenting with online self-presentation more regularly, presenting an idealized version of self and a preference for presenting themselves online. Adolescents with a more stable self-concept reported presenting an online self which was more consistent with their offline self-presentation. Younger adolescents were more likely to present an inconsistent self, whereas older adolescents presented themselves more consistently across different communication contexts. Finally, adolescents who spent more time on Facebook and had fewer Facebook friends were more likely to present multiple versions of self while online. The implications of these findings will be discussed in terms of the development of self-concept during adolescence and the potential for the online world to facilitate flexible identity construction and self-presentation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2015.0623

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fullwood C. (2015) The role of personality in online self-presentation. In Attrill A, ed. Cyberpsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–130 of 130

Metadata

Authors
Fullwood, C., James, B. M., & Chen-Wilson, C.-H. (.
Affiliations
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
  • University of Wolverhampton
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2016-11-10
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
716-720
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2552441656
Cited by
131
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Wolverhampton Intellectual Repository and E-Theses (University of Wolverhampton) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
self-concept clarity, online self-presentation, adolescents, Facebook use, identity construction, ideal self, online identity, age differences, self-concept development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Self Disclosure, Social Behavior, Friends, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review