Cited by 51Skin Diseases and DiabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchThermoregulation and physiological responses

Impact of environmental temperature on skin thickness and microvascular blood flow in subjects with and without diabetes

Forst, T., Caduff, A., Talary, M., Weder, M., Brändle, M., Kann, P., Flacke, F., Friedrich, Ch. +1 more·2006·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Glucose measurement from different skin areas might be influenced by changes in skin texture due to several environmental confounders. Our study was performed to investigate the effect of changes in ambient temperature on skin thickness and microvascular skin blood flow in subjects with and without diabetes at the lower forearm. Methods Thirteen subjects with diabetes and seven without diabetes participated in the study. The investigations were performed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled climatic chamber (EMPA, St. Gallen, Switzerland). Starting at 25 degrees C, the environmental temperature was changed in 4 degrees C steps every 40 min. Skin thickness was measured by an ultrasonic reflection technique, and microcirculation was measured by laser Doppler fluxmetry at the lower forearm. Study participants underwent the entire procedure on up to four separate study trials. Results Our study revealed a significantly reduced skin thickness (P Conclusions Although skin thickness and microvascular skin blood flow at the lower forearm were found to be reduced in patients with diabetes compared with controls without diabetes, both groups revealed comparable dynamics in skin thickness and microvascular blood flow during changes in environmental temperature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2006.8.94

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forst, T., Caduff, A., Talary, M., Weder, M., Brändle, M., Kann, P., Flacke, F., Friedrich, C., & Pfützner, A.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Solianis, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Empa (CH)
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2006-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
94-101
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W1979252227
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
skin thickness, microvascular blood flow, diabetes mellitus, ambient temperature, skin microcirculation, skin texture, laser Doppler flowmetry
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Microcirculation, Microclimate, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Skin, Temperature, Ultrasonography, Laser-Doppler Flowmetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review