The Effects of Depression on Diabetes Knowledge, Diabetes Self-Management, and Perceived Control in Indigent Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess differences in diabetes knowledge, diabetes self-management, and perceived control among depressed and nondepressed individuals in an indigent population with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Depressed and nondepressed patients with the clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were recruited from an indigent care clinic. Subjects completed validated surveys to assess diabetes knowledge, diabetes self-management, and perceived control of diabetes. We compared demographic characteristics and diabetes knowledge, diabetes self-management, and perceived control of diabetes by depression status. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Of the 201 subjects with diagnosed type 2 diabetes enrolled in the study, approximately 20% n = 40) of the sample was depressed. Subjects with depression were more likely to report self-care control problems (mean = 2.2 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.6, P < 0.001) and less likely to report positive attitude (mean = 2.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.7 +/- 0.5, P < 0.001), self-care ability (mean = 3.2 +/- 3.6 vs. 3.7 +/- 0.5, P < 0.001), and self-care adherence (mean = 3.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.6, P < 0.001). Depressed patients were less likely to report perceived control of diabetes (mean = 47.7 +/- 8.5 vs. 57.8 +/- 7.4, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in diabetes knowledge, self-care understanding, and perceived importance of self-care between depressed and nondepressed patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this indigent population with type 2 diabetes, diabetes knowledge did not differ significantly by depression status, but diabetes self-management practices and perceived control of diabetes differed significantly by depression status. Patients who were depressed had poorer diabetes self-care and felt they had less control over their disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceived control is currently considered a critical factor for successful psychological adaptation to chronic illness and neurodegenerative conditions in particular.
“perceived control is currently considered a critical factor adaptation to chronic illness (Dempster, Howell, & McCorry, 2015; Egede & Ellis, 2008) - and neurodegenerative conditions in particular (Eccles & Simpson, 2011; Simpson, Chatzidamianos, & Eccles, 2015; Zarotti, Coates et al., 2019; Zarotti, Simpson, & Fletcher, 2019)”
From Psychological interventions for people with Parkinson's disease in the early 2020s: Where do we stand? (2021) · cites this paper as Egede & Ellis, 2008
Cites
Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M., & Venkat Narayan, K. M. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.3.561 · Cited by 1,846 · see citing works
Depression and Diabetes: Impact of Depressive Symptoms on Adherence, Function, and Costs
Ciechanowski, P. S., Katon, W. J., & Russo, J. E. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.21.3278 · Cited by 1,465 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zarotti, N., Eccles, F. J. R., Foley, J. A., Paget, A., Gunn, S., Leroi, I., & Simpson, J. (2021) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12321 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Barriers to treatment engagement for depression among Latinas
Caplan, S., & Whittemore, R. (2013) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.3109/01612840.2012.762958 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Chan, R., Yates, P., & McCarthy, A. (2016) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/16.onf.762-771 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Radojkovic, J., Sikanic, N., Bukumiric, Z., Tadic, M., Kostic, N., & Babic, R. (2016) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.899571 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Rosales, C. B., Denman, C. A., Bell, M. L., Cornejo, E., Ingram, M., del Carmen Castro Vásquez, M., Gonzalez-Fagoaga, J. E., Aceves, B., Nuño, T., Anderson, E. J., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyab072 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Egede, L. E., & Ellis, C.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-219
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- OpenAlex
- W2050738599
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5K08HS114418, K08 HS011418)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- depression, type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, diabetes knowledge, perceived control, indigent patients, low-income populations, self-care adherence, self-care ability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude to Health, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Internal-External Control, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Perception, Poverty, Self Care, South Carolina, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review