Cited by 15Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Meta Salud Diabetes for cardiovascular disease prevention in Mexico: a cluster-randomized behavioural clinical trial

Open access
Rosales, Cecilia B, Denman, Catalina A, Bell, Melanie L, Cornejo, Elsa, Ingram, Maia, del Carmen Castro Vásquez, María, Gonzalez-Fagoaga, Jesús Eduardo, Aceves, Benjamín +3 more·2021·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthy lifestyle interventions offered at points of care, including support groups, may improve chronic disease management, especially in low-resource populations. We assessed the effectiveness of an educational intervention in type 2 diabetes (T2D) support groups to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. METHODS: We recruited 518 participants to a parallel, two-arm, cluster-randomized, behavioural clinical trial across 22 clinics in Sonora, Mexico, between August 2016 and October 2018. We delivered a 13-week secondary prevention intervention, Meta Salud Diabetes (MSD), within the structure of a support group (GAM: Grupo de Ayuda Mutua) in government-run (community) Health Centres (Centros de Salud). The primary study outcomes were difference in Framingham CVD risk scores and hypertension between intervention (GAM+MSD) and control (GAM usual care) arms at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: CVD risk was 3.17% age-points lower in the MSD arm versus control at 3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): -5.60, -0.75, P = 0.013); at 12 months the difference was 2.13% age-points (95% CI: -4.60, 0.34, P = 0.088). There was no evidence of a difference in hypertension rates between arms. Diabetes distress was also lower at 3 and 12 months in the MSD arm. Post-hoc analyses showed greater CVD risk reduction among men than women and among participants with HbA1c < 8. CONCLUSIONS: MSD contributed to a positive trend in reducing CVD risk in a low-resource setting. This study introduced an evidence-based curriculum that provides T2D self-management strategies for those with controlled T2D (i.e. HbA1c < 8.0) and may improve quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyab072

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McEwen MM, Pasvogel A, Gallegos G, Barrera L. Type 2 diabe- tes self-management social support intervention at the US- Mexico border. Public Health Nurs 2010;27:310-19.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosales, C. B., Denman, C. A., Bell, M. L., Cornejo, E., Ingram, M., del Carmen Castro Vásquez, M., Gonzalez-Fagoaga, J. E., Aceves, B., Nuño, T., Anderson, E. J., & Guernsey de Zapien, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • El Colegio de Sonora (MX)
  • Centro de Estudios en Salud y Sociedad, El Colegio de Sonora, Hermosillo, SN, México
  • Division of Public Health Practice & Translational Research, University of Arizona Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
  • Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
Corresponding author
Nuño, Tomas
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2021-04-11
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1272-1282
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W3152516953
Cited by
15
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01HL125996)
  • NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease prevention, diabetes support groups, secondary prevention, healthy lifestyle intervention, Framingham risk score, hypertension, diabetes distress, self-management strategies, resource-limited settings, community health centers, Sonora, Mexico
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Infant, Male, Mexico, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review