Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,094

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The P450 Superfamily: Update on New Sequences, Gene Mapping, and Recommended Nomenclature

NEBERT, DANIEL W., NELSON, DAVID R., COON, MINOR J., ESTABROOK, RONALD W., FEYEREISEN, RENE, FUJII-KURIYAMA, YOSHIAKI, GONZALEZ, FRANK J., GUENGERICH, F. PETER, GUNSALUS, IRWIN C., JOHNSON, ERIC F., LOPER, JOHN C., SATO, RYO, WATERMAN, MICHAEL R., WAXMAN, DAVID J.·1991·DNA and Cell Biology

Abstract

We provide here a list of 154 P450 genes and seven putative pseudogenes that have been characterized as of October 20, 1990. These genes have been described in a total of 23 eukaryotes (including nine mammalian and one plant species) and six prokaryotes. Of 27 gene families so far described, 10 exist in all mammals. These 10 families comprise 18 subfamilies, of which 16 and 14 have been mapped in the human and mouse genomes, respectively; to date, each subfamily appears to represent a cluster of tightly linked genes. We propose here a modest revision of the initially proposed (Nebert et al., DNA 6, 1-11, 1987) and updated (Nebert et al., DNA 8, 1-13, 1989) nomenclature system based on evolution of the superfamily. For the gene we recommend that the italicized root symbol CYP for human (Cyp for mouse), representing cytochrome P450, be followed by an Arabic number denoting the family, a letter designating the subfamily (when two or more exist), and an Arabic numeral representing the individual gene within the subfamily. A hyphen should precede the final number in mouse genes. We suggest that the human nomenclature system be used for other species. This system is consistent with our earlier proposed nomenclature for P450 of all eukaryotes and prokaryotes, except that we are discouraging the future use of cumbersome Roman numerals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dna.1991.10.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,094

Metadata

Authors
NEBERT, D. W., NELSON, D. R., COON, M. J., ESTABROOK, R. W., FEYEREISEN, R., FUJII-KURIYAMA, Y., GONZALEZ, F. J., GUENGERICH, F. P., GUNSALUS, I. C., JOHNSON, E. F., LOPER, J. C., SATO, R., WATERMAN, M. R., & WAXMAN, D. J.
Venue
DNA and Cell Biology
Published
1991-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1044-5498 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7430
OpenAlex
W2092191147
Cited by
1,094
References
1
FWCI
234.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The P450 Superfamily: Update on New Sequences, Gene Mapping, and Recommended Nomenclature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/dna.1991.10.1
The paper
NEBERT, D. W., NELSON, D. R., COON, M. J., ESTABROOK, R. W., FEYEREISEN, R., FUJII-KURIYAMA, Y., GONZALEZ, F. J., GUENGERICH, F. P., GUNSALUS, I. C., JOHNSON, E. F., LOPER, J. C., SATO, R., WATERMAN, M. R., & WAXMAN, D. J. (1991). The P450 Superfamily: Update on New Sequences, Gene Mapping, and Recommended Nomenclature. DNA and Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.1991.10.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.