Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms: Effects on Risk of Toxicity and Cancer

NEBERT, DANIEL W., MCKINNON, ROSS A., PUGA, ALVARO·1996·DNA and Cell Biology

Abstract

A growing number of human genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are being characterized. Some of these have been shown, quite convincingly, to be correlated with risk of toxicity or cancer, whereas others presently remain equivocal. There is good evidence that the correlation is stronger in populations exposed to a variety of environmental procarcinogens; perhaps 30% of DME substrates are able to be metabolically potentiated. Phase I DMEs, most of which represent cytochromes P450, metabolically activate procarcinogens to genotoxic electrophilic intermediates, and Phase II DMEs conjugate the intermediates to water-soluble derivatives, completing the detoxification cycle. It follows that genetic differences in the regulation, expression and activity of genes coding for Phase I and Phase II DMEs would be crucial factors in defining cancer susceptibility and the toxic or carcinogenic power of environmental chemicals. Not all Phase I and Phase II DMEs are implicated in detoxification; previous work from this and from other laboratories has identified candidate Phase I and Phase II genes in which certain alleles are more likely to be associated with cancer susceptibility. In some cases, the allelic frequencies vary dramatically between ethnic groups. In this review, our current knowledge about polymorphisms in the following genes are updated: the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), the CYP1A1 structural gene (which encodes aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity), the CYP1A2 structural gene (arylamine oxidations), the CYP2C19 gene (S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase), the CYP2D6 gene (debrisoquine hydroxylase), the CYP2E1 gene (N,N-dimethylnitrosamine N-demethylase), the null mutant for the GSTM1 gene (glutathione transferase mu), and the NAT2 gene (arylamine N-acetyltransferase). If unequivocal biomarkers of genetic susceptibility to cancer and toxicity can be developed successfully, then identification of individuals at increased risk would be very helpful in the fields of public health and preventive medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dna.1996.15.273

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
NEBERT, D. W., MCKINNON, R. A., & PUGA, A.
Venue
DNA and Cell Biology
Published
1996-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
273-280
ISSN
  • 1044-5498 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7430
OpenAlex
W2026550655
Cited by
335
References
3
FWCI
21.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms: Effects on Risk of Toxicity and Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/dna.1996.15.273
The paper
NEBERT, D. W., MCKINNON, R. A., & PUGA, A. (1996). Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms: Effects on Risk of Toxicity and Cancer. DNA and Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.1996.15.273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.