The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms: Effects on Risk of Toxicity and Cancer
Abstract
A growing number of human genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are being characterized. Some of these have been shown, quite convincingly, to be correlated with risk of toxicity or cancer, whereas others presently remain equivocal. There is good evidence that the correlation is stronger in populations exposed to a variety of environmental procarcinogens; perhaps 30% of DME substrates are able to be metabolically potentiated. Phase I DMEs, most of which represent cytochromes P450, metabolically activate procarcinogens to genotoxic electrophilic intermediates, and Phase II DMEs conjugate the intermediates to water-soluble derivatives, completing the detoxification cycle. It follows that genetic differences in the regulation, expression and activity of genes coding for Phase I and Phase II DMEs would be crucial factors in defining cancer susceptibility and the toxic or carcinogenic power of environmental chemicals. Not all Phase I and Phase II DMEs are implicated in detoxification; previous work from this and from other laboratories has identified candidate Phase I and Phase II genes in which certain alleles are more likely to be associated with cancer susceptibility. In some cases, the allelic frequencies vary dramatically between ethnic groups. In this review, our current knowledge about polymorphisms in the following genes are updated: the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), the CYP1A1 structural gene (which encodes aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity), the CYP1A2 structural gene (arylamine oxidations), the CYP2C19 gene (S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase), the CYP2D6 gene (debrisoquine hydroxylase), the CYP2E1 gene (N,N-dimethylnitrosamine N-demethylase), the null mutant for the GSTM1 gene (glutathione transferase mu), and the NAT2 gene (arylamine N-acetyltransferase). If unequivocal biomarkers of genetic susceptibility to cancer and toxicity can be developed successfully, then identification of individuals at increased risk would be very helpful in the fields of public health and preventive medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dioxin binding activities of polymorphic forms of mouse and human arylhydrocarbon receptors.
Ema, M., Ohe, N., Suzuki, M., Mimura, J., Sogawa, K., Ikawa, S., & Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)46990-6 · Cited by 329
Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor
Poland, A., Palen, D., & Glover, E. (1994) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09833-5 · Cited by 303
The murine Ah locus: a new allele and mapping to chromosome 12
Poland, A., Glover, E., & Taylor, B. A. (1987) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13026-5 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Hakkola, J., Pelkonen, O., Pasanen, M., & Raunio, H. (1998) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408449891344173 · Cited by 229
Cuadrado, A., Cazalla, E., Bach, A., Bathish, B., Naidu, S. D., DeNicola, G. M., Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., Fernández-Ginés, R., Grochot-Przeczek, A., Hayes, J. D., et al. (2025) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2025.103569 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- NEBERT, D. W., MCKINNON, R. A., & PUGA, A.
- Venue
- DNA and Cell Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 273-280
- ISSN
- 1044-5498 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7430
- OpenAlex
- W2026550655
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms: Effects on Risk of Toxicity and Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/dna.1996.15.273
- The paper
- NEBERT, D. W., MCKINNON, R. A., & PUGA, A. (1996). Human Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms: Effects on Risk of Toxicity and Cancer. DNA and Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.1996.15.273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.