Clarifying the Challenges: A Response to Zhiwa Woodbury's Review and Response to Radical Ecopsychology: Psychology in the Service of Life (2nd Ed.) by Andy Fisher
Abstract
In this response to Zhiwa Woodbury's review of my book Radical Ecopsychology (2nd ed.), I clarify positions of mine that I believe Woodbury presents either inaccurately or inadequately. I do this by placing his comments and criticisms within the context of the issues I think they raise about the development of ecopsychology: the conflict between the inherent radicalism of ecopsychology and the historical conservatism of psychology; the need to develop critical distance from eco-destructive systems that need to be transformed or transcended; the challenge of preserving the truths that are essential to ecopsychology as we attempt to move from periphery to center; and the need to offer new images as part of the process of ecological social change. I comment throughout on the relevance of my argument that ecopsychology is inherently radical for making sense of the first-generation/second-generation ecopsychology crossroads.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ecopsychology considers human identity and psyche as part of, not isolated from, the web of life, and that connection to nature is essential to wellbeing.
“It considers human identity and psyche as a part of, not isolated from, the web of life, and that connection to nature is essential to wellbeing [27].”
From Climate Distress: A Review of Current Psychological Research and Practice (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference
Mathewson, K., & Harvey, D. (1997) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/215233 · Cited by 4,625 · see citing works
Active Hope: How to Face the Mess We're in without Going Crazy
Macy, J. R., & Johnstone, C. (2012) · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Ecopsychology: science, totems, and the technological species
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-4131 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Radical ecopsychology: psychology in the service of life
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6460 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Kahn, P. H. (2011) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7983.001.0001 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Technological change in Capitalism: some Marxian themes
Smith, T. (2009) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bep048 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
A Peer Reviewed Journal for Ecopsychology
(2009) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0101.edi · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Ecopsychology and Environmentally Focused Psychologies
Doherty, T. J. (2010) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0076 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Ecopsychology Roundtable: Patricia Hasbach and Peter Kahn
Hasbach, P. H., Kahn, P. H., & Doherty, T. J. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0036 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Chalquist, C. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0073 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kahn, P. H., & Hasbach, P. H. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0082 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Woodbury, Z. (2013) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0024 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Breaking the Electronic Media Spell: An Ecopsychological Intervention
Gomes, M. E. (2012) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0033 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Climate Distress: A Review of Current Psychological Research and Practice
Koder, J., Dunk, J., & Rhodes, P. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15108115 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Transpersonal Ecodelia: Surveying Psychedelically Induced Biophilia
Irvine, A., Luke, D. P., Harrild, F., Gandy, S., & Watts, R. (2023) · Psychoactives · doi:10.3390/psychoactives2020012 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Three Arguments for a Radical Ecopsychology
Fisher, A. (2013) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0070 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationYmpäristöahdistus ja rituaalit: analyysia ympäristötunteiden rituaalisesta käsittelystä
Pihkala, P. (2021) · Uskonnontutkija - Religionsforskaren · doi:10.24291/uskonnontutkija.109191 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Koller, S. (2022) · Médecine & Hygiène eBooks · doi:10.3917/mh.senn.2022.01.0170 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Eco-Poetic Healing Cycle: a literary model of ecological recovery in the poetry of Aan Mansyur
Laila, W. R., & Ambarwati, A. (2026) · Journal of Poetry Therapy · doi:10.1080/08893675.2026.2678407
- Authors
- Fisher, A.
- Affiliations
- Unaffiliated, Maberly, Ontario, Canada.
- Corresponding author
- Fisher, Andy
- Venue
- Ecopsychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-162
- ISSN
- 1942-9347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015377476
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecopsychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review