The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Innovation Deficit in Urban Water: The Need for an Integrated Perspective on Institutions, Organizations, and Technology
Open accessAbstract
Interaction between institutional change and technological change poses important constraints on transitions of urban water systems to a state that can meet future needs. Research on urban water and other technology-dependent systems provides insights that are valuable to technology researchers interested in assuring that their efforts will have an impact. In the context of research on institutional change, innovation is the development, application, diffusion, and utilization of new knowledge and technology. This definition is intentionally inclusive: technological innovation will play a key role in reinvention of urban water systems, but is only part of what is necessary. Innovation usually depends on context, such that major changes to infrastructure include not only the technological inventions that drive greater efficiencies and physical transformations of water treatment and delivery systems, but also the political, cultural, social, and economic factors that hinder and enable such changes. On the basis of past and present changes in urban water systems, institutional innovation will be of similar importance to technological innovation in urban water reinvention. To solve current urban water infrastructure challenges, technology-focused researchers need to recognize the intertwined nature of technologies and institutions and the social systems that control change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Cited by
Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth
Flörke, M., Schneider, C., & McDonald, R. I. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8 · Cited by 910
Emerging solutions to the water challenges of an urbanizing world
Larsen, T. A., Hoffmann, S., Lüthi, C., Truffer, B., & Maurer, M. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8641 · Cited by 871
Self-citationPruden, A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403883p · Cited by 290
Reviewing financing barriers and strategies for urban nature-based solutions
Toxopeus, H., & Polzin, F. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112371 · Cited by 196
van Leeuwen, K., de Vries, E., Koop, S., & Roest, K. (2018) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-018-0995-8 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiparsky, M., Sedlak, D. L., Thompson, B. H., & Truffer, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Engineering Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 395-408
- ISSN
- 1092-8758 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9018
- OpenAlex
- W2019359490
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.