Cited by 31Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

High Temperature Co-pyrolysis Thermal Air Activation Enhances Biochar Adsorption of Herbicides from Surface Water

Kearns, Joshua P., Shimabuku, Kyle K., Knappe, Detlef R.U., Summers, R. Scott·2019·Environmental Engineering Science

Abstract

Recent interest has arisen in the use of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for control of organic micropollutants in water. However, compared with activated carbon (AC), biochar adsorption capacity is typically one to two orders of magnitude lower. This study reports batch mode adsorption of anionic (2,4-D, C 0 100 μg/L) and neutral (simazine [SZN], C 0 1.5 μg/L) herbicides from surface water containing dissolved organic matter at 4 mg/L total organic carbon concentration. Enhanced adsorption was observed by biochars generated from updraft gasifiers under conditions of simultaneous co-pyrolysis thermal air activation (CPTA). 2,4-D adsorption by ≥850°C CPTA biochars was more than 10 times greater on a mass basis compared with biochars generated from a conventional anoxic pyrolysis (CAP) reactor and was equivalent to AC reference adsorbents on a surface area normalized basis. Biochars generated at ≥850°C under CPTA conditions had similar micropore surface area to CAP biochars (∼330 m 2 /g) but about 2.5 times the mesopore surface area (∼110 m 2 /g CPTA, ∼40 m 2 /g CAP), suggestive of increased pore accessibility generated by thermochemical widening of pores and/or removal of pyrolysis tars by CPTA. 2,4-D adsorption from surface water was shown to correlate strongly with biochar H:C molar ratio within but not between biochars grouped by CAP and CPTA generation conditions. Comparing adsorption of 2,4-D and SZN by biochars generated from CAP and CPTA conditions suggested that herbic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ees.2018.0476

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearns, J. P., Shimabuku, K. K., Knappe, D. R. U., & Summers, R. S.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Kearns, Joshua P.
Venue
Environmental Engineering Science
Published
2019-06-01
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
710-723
ISSN
  • 1092-8758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9018
OpenAlex
W2920825867
Cited by
31
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
biochar, herbicide adsorption, 2,4-D, simazine, surface water, dissolved organic matter, micropollutants, pore structure, surface functional groups, hydrogen bonding, activated carbon comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review