Cited by 27Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaQualitative Research Methods and Applications

Talk to me, please!: the importance of qualitative research to games for health

Thompson, Debbe·2014·Games for Health Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/g4h.2014.0023

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, D.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Debbe
Venue
Games for Health Journal
Published
2014-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
117-118
ISSN
  • 2161-783X (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-7856
OpenAlex
W2194352193
Cited by
27
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Games for Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
health games, serious games, qualitative research, player experience, game design, health behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review