The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Motivations and Player Experiences of Older Adults in Virtual Reality Training
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: We studied which games and underlying game mechanics are considered motivating by older adults, so that designers and therapists make informed choices when designing or selecting virtual reality (VR)-training interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a repeated measures design with 30 older participants, who played eight different VR-training games and afterward filled out the intrinsic motivation inventory (IMI). Differences in intrinsic motivation between games were analyzed using Friedman's tests. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted according to the laddering technique, to unveil the underlying game mechanics that lead to the players preferences. RESULTS: IMI scores were relatively high for all games, indicating that these VR games seem effective for inducing a high intrinsic motivation. Wii yoga and Kinect Adventures were the highest scoring games on all but the negative subscale tension. Both games provided regular positive feedback. An important game mechanic was Variation, which showed a strong link to important values such as: to Stay Focused, Improve Fitness, and Health and Independency. Furthermore, the game mechanics Visual Feedback and Positive Feedback, which lead to an increased Drive to Perform, were perceived valuable. Seemingly contradicting, but both important attributes such as Speed versus Slow Movements emphasize the importance of designing VR training that adapts to the skill level of the player. CONCLUSION: We have shown that games with different game mechanics can induce high intrinsic motivation. When designing or selecting VR balance training games for older adults, these game mechanics should be incorporated to optimize a positive user experience and increase intrinsic motivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A Dutch study on motivations of older adults participating in VR training suggested that both enjoyment and challenge, conceptualised as the drive to perform, were intrinsic motivators.
“A Dutch study on the motivations of older adults participating in VR training suggested that both enjoyment and challenge, conceptualised as the drive to perform, were intrinsic motivators (De Vries et al., 2018).”
From User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as De Vries et al., 2018
The Conclusions and ‘Important game mechanics’ sections support enjoyment and the ‘Drive to Perform’ as important to older adults’ motivation in VR training. The copy does not establish that this was a Dutch study: its affiliations are predominantly Belgian, and the Participants section names a Leuven ethics committee without stating where participants were recruited. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth De Vries et al. (2018) and Subramanian et al. (2020) agreed that enjoyment and perceived effectiveness of the game were important motivators for older adults.
“Both studies did agree, however, that enjoyment and perceived effectiveness of the game were important motivators for older adults (De Vries et al., 2018;Subramanian et al., 2020).”
From User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as De Vries et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.
Ryan, R. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450 · Cited by 2,721
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1080/07853890510007197 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52310.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1743-0003-10-101 · DOI
- 10.1186/1743-0003-11-12 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40279-016-0485-1 · DOI
- Wollersheim D, 2010, Int J Emerg Technol Soc, 8, 85
- 10.1071/NB10056 · DOI
- Granacher U, 2012, J Aging Res, 2012
- 10.1093/geront/gnr012 · DOI
- 10.2147/CIA.S41453 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.020 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.197321 · DOI
- 10.1177/1460458215598638 · DOI
- 10.1177/1555412010364978 · DOI
- 10.1145/2858036.2858062 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.736 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01449290500331156 · DOI
- 10.2519/jospt.2010.3121 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00023-U · DOI
- 10.1177/002224298204600207 · DOI
- Reynolds TJ, 1988, J Advert Res, 28, 11
- 10.1007/s00779-011-0408-y · DOI
- 10.1016/S0004-9514(05)70034-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1159/000365755 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x · DOI
- 10.1145/3116595.3116608 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carroll, J., Hopper, L., Farrelly, A. M., Lombard-Vance, R., Bamidis, P. D., & Konstantinidis, E. I. (2021) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.655338 · Cited by 80
Immersive Virtual Reality for Older Adults: Empirically Grounded Design Guidelines
Abeele, V. V., Schraepen, B., Huygelier, H., Gillebert, C., Gerling, K., & Van Ee, R. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3470743 · Cited by 72
Self-citationUser experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
Lim, K. J., McGuckian, T. B., Cole, M. H., Duckworth, J., & Wilson, P. H. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-5 · Cited by 5
“The concept of challenge was associated with receiving positive visual feedback, so that participants were aware when they perform well, and with a game speed that is fast enough to increase challenge without overstressing older adult participants (De Vries et al., 2018).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- de Vries, A. W., van Dieën, J. H., van den Abeele, V., & Verschueren, S. M. P.
- Affiliations
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences (NL)
- Computer Science Technology TC, Group T, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Verschueren, Sabine M.P.
- Venue
- Games for Health Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 369-376
- ISSN
- 2161-783X (ISSN-L)
- 2161-7856
- OpenAlex
- W2894971326
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.vu.nl
- Locations
- Games for Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (2011–0015)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- virtual reality training, older adults, intrinsic motivation, game mechanics, balance training, positive feedback, visual feedback, variations, user experience, laddering technique
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review