Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety and Short-Term Toxicity of a Novel Cationic Lipid Formulation for Human Gene Therapy

Open access
San, Hong, Yang, Zhi-Yong, Pompili, Vincent J., Jaffe, Michele L., Plautz, Gregory E., Xu, Ling, Felgner, Jiin H., Wheeler, Carl J., Felgner, Philip L., Gao, Xiang, Huang, Leaf, Gordon, David, Nabel, Gary J., Nabel, Elizabeth G.·1993·Human Gene Therapy

Abstract

Among the potential nonviral vectors for human gene therapy are DNA–liposome complexes. In a recent clinical study, this delivery system has been utilized. In this report, a novel cationic lipid, dimyristyloxypropyl-3-dimethyl-hydroxyethyl ammonium (DMRIE), has been substituted into the DNA–liposome complex with dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), which both improves transfection efficiencies and allows increased doses of DNA to be delivered in vivo. The safety and toxicity of this DNA–liposome complex has been evaluated in two species, mice and pigs. The efficacy of DMRIE/DOPE in inducing an antitumor response in mice after transfer of a foreign MHC has been confirmed. No abnormalities were detected after administration of up to 1,000-fold higher concentrations of DNA and lipid than could be tolerated in vivo previously. Examination of serum biochemical enzymes, pathologic examination of tissue, and analysis of cardiac function in mice and pigs revealed no toxicities related to this treatment. This improved cationic lipid formulation is well-tolerated in vivo and could therefore allow higher dose administration and potentially greater efficiency of gene transfer for gene therapy. Although several viral vectors have been widely applied to the treatment of human disease, the development of nonviral vectors is still in their infancy. In this report, a novel cationic lipid, DMRIE/DOPE, has been incorporated into the DNA–liposome formulation that improves transfection efficiencies and allows up to 1,000-fold higher concentrations of DNA to be administered in vivo. In this paper, the safety and toxicity of this formulation is described in two species, mice and pigs, suggesting that it may prove useful for human gene therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.1993.4.6-781

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
San, H., Yang, Z.-Y., Pompili, V. J., Jaffe, M. L., Plautz, G. E., Xu, L., Felgner, J. H., Wheeler, C. J., Felgner, P. L., Gao, X., Huang, L., Gordon, D., Nabel, G. J., & Nabel, E. G.
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
1993-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
781-788
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W2038373216
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and Short-Term Toxicity of a Novel Cationic Lipid Formulation for Human Gene Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/hum.1993.4.6-781
The paper
San, H., Yang, Z.-Y., Pompili, V. J., Jaffe, M. L., Plautz, G. E., Xu, L., Felgner, J. H., Wheeler, C. J., Felgner, P. L., Gao, X., Huang, L., Gordon, D., Nabel, G. J., & Nabel, E. G. (1993). Safety and Short-Term Toxicity of a Novel Cationic Lipid Formulation for Human Gene Therapy. Human Gene Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.1993.4.6-781

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.