Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repeated Aerosolized AAV-CFTR for Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 2B Trial

Moss, Richard B., Milla, Carlos, Colombo, John, Accurso, Frank, Zeitlin, Pamela L., Clancy, John P., Spencer, L. Terry, Pilewski, Joseph, Waltz, David A., Dorkin, Henry L., Ferkol, Thomas, Pian, Mark, Ramsey, Bonnie, Carter, Barrie J., Martin, Dana B., Heald, Alison E.·2007·Human Gene Therapy

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that delivery of a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector encoding the complete human cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) cDNA (tgAAVCF) to the nose, sinus, and lungs of subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) was safe and well tolerated. In a small randomized, double-blind study of three doses of aerosolized tgAAVCF or placebo at 30-day intervals, encouraging but non-significant trends in pulmonary function and induced sputum interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels were seen at early time points. This larger study was conducted to verify these trends. One hundred and two subjects aged 12 years and older with mild-to-moderate cystic fibrosis (forced expiratory flow in 1 sec [FEV1]:60% predicted) were randomized to two aerosolized doses of 1x10(13)DNase-resistant particles of tgAAVCF (n=51) or matching placebo (n=51) administered 30 days apart. Although tgAAVCF was well tolerated, the study did not meet its primary efficacy end point of statistically significant improvement in FEV1 30 days after initial administration of tgAAVCF compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in spirometric lung function over time, induced sputum biologic markers, or days of antibiotic use in either treatment group. Thus repeated doses of aerosolized tgAAVCF were safe and well tolerated, but did not result in significant improvement in lung function over time. Because gene transfer is the simplest, most basic way to correct the underlying genetic defect that leads to disease in CF, further research is warranted to develop an effective gene transfer agent for the treatment of CF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/hum.2007.022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Moss, R. B., Milla, C., Colombo, J., Accurso, F., Zeitlin, P. L., Clancy, J. P., Spencer, L. T., Pilewski, J., Waltz, D. A., Dorkin, H. L., Ferkol, T., Pian, M., Ramsey, B., Carter, B. J., Martin, D. B., & Heald, A. E.
Venue
Human Gene Therapy
Published
2007-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
726-732
ISSN
  • 1043-0342 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7422
OpenAlex
W2061752094
Cited by
277
References
2
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeated Aerosolized AAV-CFTR for Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 2B Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/hum.2007.022
The paper
Moss, R. B., Milla, C., Colombo, J., Accurso, F., Zeitlin, P. L., Clancy, J. P., Spencer, L. T., Pilewski, J., Waltz, D. A., Dorkin, H. L., Ferkol, T., Pian, M., Ramsey, B., Carter, B. J., Martin, D. B., & Heald, A. E. (2007). Repeated Aerosolized AAV-CFTR for Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 2B Trial. Human Gene Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2007.022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.