Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interval between First Palliative Care Consult and Death in Patients Diagnosed with Advanced Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Osta, Badi El, Palmer, J. Lynn, Paraskevopoulos, Timotheos, Pei, Be-Lian, Roberts, Lynn E., Poulter, Valerie A., Chacko, Ray, Bruera, Eduardo·2008·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most referrals to palliative care and hospice occur late in the trajectory of the disease although an earlier intervention could decrease patients' symptom distress. The purpose of this study was to determine the interval between first palliative care consult (PC1) and death (D) in patients diagnosed with advanced cancer (aCA) at our comprehensive cancer center and if such interval has increased over time. METHODS: The study group was 2868 consecutive patients who had their PC1 during a 30-month period. We reviewed the charts for information about demographics, cancer type, date of cancer (CA) diagnosis, aCA diagnosis, PC1, and D. aCA was defined as locally recurrent or metastatic. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred four patients (49%) were female, 1791 (62%) were less than 65 years old, 2563 (89%) had solid tumors, and 2004 (70%) were white. The median PC1-D, aCA-PC1, aCA-D, and CA-D intervals were 42, 147, 250, and 570 days, respectively. The median PC1-D interval was longer in patients with solid tumors (p < 0.0001), less than 65 years old (p = 0.002), and females (p = 0.004). PC1-D was not affected by ethnicity (p = 0.42). The median PC1-D interval in 5 consecutive half-years was 46, 56, 42, 41, and 34 days, respectively (p = 0.02). The number of PC1 in this period increased from 544 to 654 (20%). The ratio of PC involvement in the aCA-D period (PC1-D/aCA-D) decreased from 0.30 to 0.26 over the 5 half-year periods (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The first palliative care consultation to death interval has decreased over time at our center. Education is needed among our referring physicians for earlier access to palliative care. Prospective studies are needed to establish the appropriate timing of the first palliative care consultation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2007.0103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Osta, B. E., Palmer, J. L., Paraskevopoulos, T., Pei, B.-L., Roberts, L. E., Poulter, V. A., Chacko, R., & Bruera, E.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2008-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2084750201
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interval between First Palliative Care Consult and Death in Patients Diagnosed with Advanced Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/jpm.2007.0103
The paper
Osta, B. E., Palmer, J. L., Paraskevopoulos, T., Pei, B.-L., Roberts, L. E., Poulter, V. A., Chacko, R., & Bruera, E. (2008). Interval between First Palliative Care Consult and Death in Patients Diagnosed with Advanced Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Journal of Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2007.0103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.