Cited by 115Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Stress, Burnout, Compassion Fatigue, and Mental Health in Hospice Workers in Minnesota

Whitebird, Robin R., Asche, Stephen E., Thompson, Gretchen L., Rossom, Rebecca, Heinrich, Richard·2013·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Working in hospice care is a highly challenging yet rewarding profession. However, the challenges of working with dying patients and their families can overwhelm even the most highly dedicated professional, leading to burnout, compassion fatigue, anxiety, and depression. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to better understand how stress affects the mental health of hospice workers in terms of burnout and compassion fatigue and how they cope with these issues. METHODS: Data for this study are from Compassion Fatigue and You, a cross-sectional survey of hospice staff from across Minnesota. We surveyed 547 hospice workers throughout Minnesota to better understand the overall mental health of staff, including levels of stress, burnout, and compassion fatigue, and how they cope with these issues. The study was conducted in 2008 and 2009 through a private, not-for-profit research institute affiliated with a large Midwestern health plan. RESULTS: Hospice staff reported high levels of stress, with a small but significant proportion reporting moderate-to-severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, compassion fatigue, and burnout. Staff reported managing their stress through physical activity and social support, and they suggested that more opportunities to connect with coworkers and to exercise could help decrease staff burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Poor mental health places staff at risk for burnout and likely contributes to staff leaving hospice care; this is a critical issue as the profession attempts to attract new staff to meet the expanding demands for hospice care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2013.0202

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitebird, R. R., Asche, S. E., Thompson, G. L., Rossom, R., & Heinrich, R.
Affiliations
  • HealthPartners (US)
  • Allina Health (US)
Corresponding author
Whitebird, Robin R.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2013-12
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1534-1539
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W1862532608
Cited by
115
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
hospice staff, burnout, compassion fatigue, occupational stress, mental health, depression, anxiety, coping strategies, social support, physical activity, employee retention, Minnesota
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Empathy, Mental Fatigue, Female, Health Personnel, Hospices, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review