Factors Associated with Family Caregivers' Confidence in Future Surrogate Decision Making for Persons with Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background: Improving family caregiver preparation for surrogate decision making is a critical priority. Objective: Determine a parsimonious set of intrapersonal factors associated with family caregivers' confidence in making future medical decisions for their relatives with cancer. Methods: Cross-sectional mail survey. Family caregivers of Medicare beneficiaries with pancreatic, lung, brain, ovarian, head and neck, hematologic, and stage IV cancers from communities of eight U.S. cancer centers. Participants completed validated measures of their social and mental health, self-care behaviors, coping styles, and surrogate decision-making confidence. Using linear modeling, the Bayesian information criterion was used to identify factors associated with decision-making confidence. A bootstrap approach was used to conduct penalized inference on the selected model coefficients. Model fit validation was assessed with a random forest ensemble. Results: Caregivers ( n = 294) were on average 65.5 years old, mostly female (72.8%), and care recipients' spouse/partner (60.2%). The parsimonious set of factors associated with low caregiver decision-making confidence included less engagement in spiritual growth self-care, more use of avoidant coping, low emotional social support, and younger care recipient age (in-sample R 2 = 0.22). These factors were also identified by a random forest approach. After overfitting adjustment (shrunken R 2 = 0.09), the strongest associations with low surrogate…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sample size provided 80% power to detect a small to moderate intervention effect of Cohen d = 0.38.
“Assuming 38% attrition (based on our prior trials),14,17 an α of .05, and intrasubject correlation among 3 repeated measures of 0.5, the sample size provided 80% power to detect a small to moderate intervention effect of Cohen d = 0.38.”
From Palliative Care Coaching for Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: Development and Psychometric Characteristics
WALKER, S. N., SECHRIST, K. R., & PENDER, N. J. (1987) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002 · Cited by 1,427 · cited 1× · see citing works
“22 The authors of the instrument note that it refers to universal aspects of human experience.”
White, D. B., Ernecoff, N., Buddadhumaruk, P., Hong, S., Weissfeld, L., Curtis, J. R., Luce, J. M., & Lo, B. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.5351 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
The Patient Care Connect Program: Transforming Health Care Through Lay Navigation
Rocque, G. B., Partridge, E. E., Pisu, M., Martin, M. Y., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Acemgil, A., Kenzik, K., Kvale, E. A., Meneses, K., Li, X., et al. (2016) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.2015.008896 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationDavis, E. L., Deane, F. P., Lyons, G. C., Barclay, G. D., Bourne, J., & Connolly, V. (2020) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105317715091 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palliative Care Coaching for Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Odom, J. N., Azuero, A., Taylor, R. A., Young Pierce, J., McGowen, C. L., Pisu, M., Rocque, G., Reed, R. D., Wells, R., Gazaway, S., et al. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.19807
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dionne-Odom, J. N., Ejem, D., Azuero, A., Taylor, R. A., Rocque, G. B., Turkman, Y., Thompson, M. A., Knight, S. J., Martin, M. Y., & Bakitas, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1705-1712
- ISSN
- 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7740
- PMC
- PMC6308286
- OpenAlex
- W2888159682
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society
- National Palliative Care Research Center
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- National Cancer Institute (R25CA047888, P30CA013148)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (K99NR015903, R01NR013665)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- family caregivers, surrogate decision-making, decision confidence, cancer, avoidance coping, social support, caregiver preparation, advance care planning, caregiver mental health
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Caregivers, Proxy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review