Cited by 24Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesNursing care and researchEthics in medical practice

Factors Associated with Family Caregivers' Confidence in Future Surrogate Decision Making for Persons with Cancer

Open access
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas, Ejem, Deborah, Azuero, Andres, Taylor, Richard A., Rocque, Gabrielle B., Turkman, Yasemin, Thompson, Moneka A., Knight, Sara J. +2 more·2018·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Improving family caregiver preparation for surrogate decision making is a critical priority. Objective: Determine a parsimonious set of intrapersonal factors associated with family caregivers' confidence in making future medical decisions for their relatives with cancer. Methods: Cross-sectional mail survey. Family caregivers of Medicare beneficiaries with pancreatic, lung, brain, ovarian, head and neck, hematologic, and stage IV cancers from communities of eight U.S. cancer centers. Participants completed validated measures of their social and mental health, self-care behaviors, coping styles, and surrogate decision-making confidence. Using linear modeling, the Bayesian information criterion was used to identify factors associated with decision-making confidence. A bootstrap approach was used to conduct penalized inference on the selected model coefficients. Model fit validation was assessed with a random forest ensemble. Results: Caregivers ( n = 294) were on average 65.5 years old, mostly female (72.8%), and care recipients' spouse/partner (60.2%). The parsimonious set of factors associated with low caregiver decision-making confidence included less engagement in spiritual growth self-care, more use of avoidant coping, low emotional social support, and younger care recipient age (in-sample R 2 = 0.22). These factors were also identified by a random forest approach. After overfitting adjustment (shrunken R 2 = 0.09), the strongest associations with low surrogate…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2018.0148

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sample size provided 80% power to detect a small to moderate intervention effect of Cohen d = 0.38.

    “Assuming 38% attrition (based on our prior trials),14,17 an α of .05, and intrasubject correlation among 3 repeated measures of 0.5, the sample size provided 80% power to detect a small to moderate intervention effect of Cohen d = 0.38.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dionne-Odom, J. N., Ejem, D., Azuero, A., Taylor, R. A., Rocque, G. B., Turkman, Y., Thompson, M. A., Knight, S. J., Martin, M. Y., & Bakitas, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2018-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1705-1712
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2888159682
Cited by
24
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Palliative Care Research Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • National Cancer Institute (R25CA047888, P30CA013148)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (K99NR015903, R01NR013665)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
family caregivers, surrogate decision-making, decision confidence, cancer, avoidance coping, social support, caregiver preparation, advance care planning, caregiver mental health
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Caregivers, Proxy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review