Cited by 4Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Change in Code Status Orders of Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 Throughout the Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Open access
Jacobson, Emily, Troost, Jonathan P., Epler, Katharine, Lenhan, Blair, Rodgers, Lily, O'Callaghan, Thomas, Painter, Natalia, Barrett, Julie·2023·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Aim:Our aim was to examine how code status orders for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 changed over time as the pandemic progressed and outcomes improved. Methods:This retrospective cohort study was performed at a single academic center in the United States. Adults admitted between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, who tested positive for COVID-19, were included. The study period included four institutional hospitalization surges. Demographic and outcome data were collected and code status orders during admission were trended. Data were analyzed with multivariable analysis to identify predictors of code status. Results:A total of 3615 patients were included with full code (62.7%) being the most common final code status order followed by do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) (18.1%). Time of admission (per every six months) was an independent predictor of final full compared to DNAR/partial code status (p = 0.04). Limited resuscitation preference (DNAR or partial) decreased from over 20% in the first two surges to 10.8% and 15.6% of patients in the last two surges. Other independent predictors of final code status included body mass index (p < 0.05), Black versus White race (0.64, p = 0.01), time spent in the intensive care unit (4.28, p = <0.001), age (2.11, p = <0.001), and Charlson comorbidity index (1.05, p = <0.001). Conclusions:Over time, adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 were less likely to have a DNAR or partial code status order with persistent decrease occurring after March 2021. A trend toward decreased code status documentation as the pandemic progressed was observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2022.0578

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present result agrees with another study that found declining selection of limited resuscitation options over the pandemic.

    “This finding is in line with another study that also saw fewer people choosing limited resuscitation options as the pandemic went on.5”
  • The data indicate that the pandemic setting contributed to how patients made code status decisions.

    “Although our study did not directly investigate these hypotheses, the data suggests that the pandemic context played a role in shaping patient choices.5”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobson, E., Troost, J. P., Epler, K., Lenhan, B., Rodgers, L., O'Callaghan, T., Painter, N., & Barrett, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Corresponding author
Jacobson, Emily
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2023-09-01
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1188-1197
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W4362656995
Cited by
4
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002240, UM1TR004404)
  • Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (UL1 TR002240)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, do not attempt resuscitation, advance care planning, temporal trends, ICU length of stay, comorbidities, racial disparities, body mass index, end-of-life preferences
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Hospitalization, Humans, Retrospective Studies, United States, Resuscitation Orders, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review