The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arthritis Burden and Impact are Greater among U.S. Women than Men: Intervention Opportunities
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To summarize arthritis burden and impact among women compared with men, using updated surveillance and impact measures; to describe public health approaches to arthritis; and to review effective, evidence-based arthritis self-management interventions. RESULTS: Arthritis continues to burden the U.S. population as the leading cause of physical disability and affects women disproportionately: women with arthritis report greater prevalence of activity and work limitations, psychological distress, and severe joint pain than their male counterparts. Three main public health interventions can reduce arthritis impact: self-management education, physical activity, and weight management. Self-management education programs are proven to reduce pain and depression, delay disability, improve self-efficacy, physical function, and quality of life, and reduce healthcare costs. Appropriate physical activity decreases pain, improves function, and delays disability. The American College of Rheumatology recommends maintaining a healthy weight to benefit patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Women appear more receptive to certain information delivery methods (i.e., physician counseling) than men, suggesting gender-specific targeting of interventions may be of use. CONCLUSIONS: Effective interventions remain underused. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Arthritis Program and its partners, including state arthritis programs, continue their efforts to build the arthritis public health science base, monitor burden and impact, evaluate and disseminate evidence-based interventions, and work to decrease and delay disability, and increase quality of life among those with arthritis. As new approaches are developed, women and other disproportionately impacted groups merit particular consideration in tailoring and delivering programs to reduce arthritis burden.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Positive outcome expectancy has been identified as a protective factorfrom the transition from acute to chronic pain 354–356.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [354]
Citations
Cites
KESSLER, R. C., ANDREWS, G., COLPE, L. J., HIRIPI, E., MROCZEK, D. K., NORMAND, S.-L. T., WALTERS, E. E., & ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702006074 · Cited by 10,327
Lorig, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Stewart, A. L., Brown, B. W., Bandura, A., Ritter, P., Gonzalez, V. M., Laurent, D. D., & Holman, H. R. (1999) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003 · Cited by 2,261
Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update
(2002) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.10148 · Cited by 1,202
Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update
Yood, R. A. (2002) · Cited by 1,090
Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations
Hootman, J. M., & Helmick, C. G. (2005) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.21562 · Cited by 888
Self-citationLorig, K. R., Mazonson, P. D., & Holman, H. R. (1993) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780360403 · Cited by 871
Guidelines for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis 2002 Update
Goolsby, M. J., & Newsome, G. (2002) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2002.tb00072.x · Cited by 858
Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
Botman, S., & Moriarity, C. L. (2000) · Cited by 785
Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature With Meta-Analysis
Dickens, C. M., McGowan, L., Clark-Carter, D. D., & Creed, F. H. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200201000-00008 · Cited by 635
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002, MMWR, 51, 371
- Sacks JJ, 2005, J Rheumatol, 32, 340
- Botman SL, 2000, National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat, 2, 1
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1995, MMWR, 44, 329
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001, MMWR, 50, 334
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001, MMWR, 50, 120
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005, MMWR, 54, 484
- Van Baar ME, 1998, J Rheumatol, 25, 2432
- Elkblom B, 1975, Scand J Rheumatol, 4, 633
- Wyatt FB, 2001, J Strength Cond Res, 15, 337
- Busch A, 2002, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, D003786
- Brady TJ, 2006, Atlanta, GA: Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals, 203
- Lorig KR, 2005, Arthritis Rheum, 52, S234
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases
Boeing, H., Bechthold, A., Bub, A., Ellinger, S., Haller, D., Kroke, A., Leschik‐Bonnet, E., Müller, M. J., Oberritter, H., Schulze, M. B., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-012-0380-y · Cited by 1,875
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 · Cited by 719
Anxiety and depression in patients with osteoarthritis: impact and management challenges
Sharma, A., Kudesia, P., Shi, Q., & Gandhi, R. A. (2016) · Open Access Rheumatology Research and Reviews · doi:10.2147/oarrr.s93516 · Cited by 242
INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Baru, P. C. R. (2014) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 236
Montecucco, F., & Mach, F. (2008) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken395 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Theis, K. A., Helmick, C. G., & Hootman, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Women's Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-453
- ISSN
- 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9996
- 1931-843X
- OpenAlex
- W2106572941
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
- Keywords
- arthritis, sex differences, women, disability, self-management education, physical activity, weight management, osteoarthritis, gender-specific interventions, public health interventions, quality of life, pain
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Osteoarthritis, Primary Prevention, Quality of Life, Self Care, Sex Factors, United States, Prevalence, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review