Cited by 10Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Alcohol Dependence in Women: Difficulty of Its Assessment in General Practice

Charrel, Claire-Lise, Cuervo-Lombard, Christine-Vanessa, Miron, Maria, Fruntes, Valeriu, Béra-Potelle, Céline, Limosin, Frédéric·2010·Journal of Women's Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In France, women represent approximately 20% of alcohol-dependent subjects. Although general practitioners (GPs) are often these women's first medical contact, GPs may be reluctant to probe for alcohol dependence. METHOD: In this context, in 1996 and 2006 we conducted a cross-sectional survey using self-completion postal questionnaires sent to all GPs in a French département (administrative area), with the aim to explore and to compare after a ten-year time lapse, expectations and relational difficulties in managing alcohol dependence in women. RESULTS: A total of 300 GPs returned the questionnaire for the two data collection times. According to the GPs, comparing 1996 and 2006, there was less embarrassment among female patient to talk about alcohol consumption and a lesser tendency to break off medical care (33.7% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.001, and 13.3% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.002, respectively). In 2006, more GPs considered they were well informed about specialized care in alcohol dependence than in 1996 (76.8% vs. 59.9%, p < 0.0001), and more often reported referring their female patients to specialized centers (73.0% vs. 52.7%, p < 0.0001), rather than medical or psychiatric wards. Young GPs, aged under 40, seem rather to have had difficulty using the managed care network than lacking medical knowledge related to female alcohol dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that over ten years there has been a decrease in the tendency among women to deny their alcohol dependence, and that they more readily accept specific care. In the same period, GPs have benefited from better information about specialized management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jwh.2009.1505

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charrel, C.-L., Cuervo-Lombard, C.-V., Miron, M., Fruntes, V., Béra-Potelle, C., & Limosin, F.
Affiliations
  • Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
  • Université de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Robert Debré Hospital, University of Reims, Reims, France.
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Limosin, Frédéric
Venue
Journal of Women's Health
Published
2010-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
343-348
ISSN
  • 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9996
  • 1931-843X
OpenAlex
W1981286955
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
alcoholism, women, general practitioners, alcohol screening, physician-patient relationship, help-seeking, specialist referral, physician knowledge, managed care networks, gender differences in drinking
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family Practice, Female, France, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Truth Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review