Cited by 33Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Factors influencing GPs' decisions regarding screening for high alcohol consumption: a focus group study in Swedish primary care

Johansson, K., Bendtsen, P., Åkerlind, I.·2005·Public Health

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to explore factors that influence general practitioners' (GPs') decisions regarding screening for high alcohol consumption.Methods GPs working at three primary healthcare centres in Sweden participated in focus group interviews. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and a deductive framework approach was used for the analysis.Results The majority of the participating GPs did not believe in asking all patients about their alcohol consumption. Reported factors that influenced how many and which patients were questioned about alcohol consumption were time, age of the patient, consultation setting, patient-physician relationship, what symptoms the patient presented with, and knowledge of measures if patients appear to have a high alcohol consumption. Thus, alcohol screening and intervention were not performed in all patient groups as was originally intended, but were performed in limited groups of patients such as those with alcohol-related symptoms.Conclusions Although the number of participants in this study was small and the conclusions cannot be generalized, the results provide some valuable insights into why GPs are hesitant to engage in screening for high alcohol consumption. Since prevention of alcohol-related health problems is an important public health issue, many different screening and intervention strategies have to be formulated and evaluated in order to reach patients with both hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption within the healthcare system. Screening all consecutive patients for a limited period or screening patient groups known to include a fairly high frequency of high alcohol consumers are two ways of limiting the time requirements and increasing role legitimacy. Still, there is a need for a broader public health strategy involving many players in the community in alcohol preventive measures, especially in more primary preventive approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.12.006

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansson, K., Bendtsen, P., & Åkerlind, I.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Johansson, K.
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
119
Issue
9
Pages
781-788
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087297293
Cited by
33
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol screening, general practitioners, physician decision-making, primary care, alcohol-related symptoms, physician-patient relationship, role legitimacy, alcohol prevention
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Counseling, Decision Making, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Humans, Medical History Taking, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Sweden, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review