The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence and Academic Impact of Dysmenorrhea in 21,573 Young Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Dysmenorrhea (period pain) and associated symptoms are very common in young women <25 years. This time corresponds with a significant stage in adolescents and young women's academic lives at both school and in higher education. Dysmenorrhea may cause absenteeism from class or result in reduced classroom concentration and performance. Owing to cultural and economic differences, any impact may vary by country. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the prevalence of dysmenorrhea in young women and explores any impact it has on their academic performance and other school-related activities. Materials and Methods: A search in Medline, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature was carried out in June 2018. Results: Thirty-eight studies including 21,573 young women were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-three studies were from low-, lower middle-, or upper middle-income countries, and 15 studies were from high-income countries. The prevalence of dysmenorrhea was high 71.1% (N = 37, n = 20,813, 95% confidence interval [CI] 66.6–75.2) irrespective of the economic status of the country. Rates of dysmenorrhea were similar between students at school (N = 24, 72.5%, 95% CI 67.5–77.0) and at university (N = 7, 74.9%, 95% CI 62.9–84.0). Academic impact was significant, with 20.1% reporting absence from school or university due to dysmenorrhea (N = 19, n = 11,226, 95% CI 14.9–26.7) and 40.9% reporting classroom performance or concentration being negatively affected (N = 10, n = 5126, 95% CI 28.3–54.9). Conclusions: The prevalence of dysmenorrhea was high, irrespective of country, with dysmenorrhea having a significant negative impact on academic performance both at school and during higher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Dysmenorrhea
Ju, H., Jones, M., & Mishra, G. (2014) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxt009 · Cited by 835
Latthe, P., Latthe, M., Say, L., Gülmezoglu, M., & Khan, K. S. (2006) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-177 · Cited by 764
Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: systematic review
Latthe, P., Mignini, L., Gray, R., Hills, R., & Khan, K. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38748.697465.55 · Cited by 581
An epidemiologic study of young women with dysmenorrhea
Andersch, B., & Milsom, I. (1982) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(82)90433-1 · Cited by 546
Diagnosis and management of dysmenorrhoea
Proctor, M., & Farquhar, C. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1134 · Cited by 505
Twyman, L., Bonevski, B., Paul, C., & Bryant, J. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006414 · Cited by 462
JAMIESON, D., & STEEGE, J. (1996) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00360-6 · Cited by 439
Prevalence and Impact of Dysmenorrhea on Hispanic Female Adolescents
Banikarim, C., Chacko, M. R., & Kelder, S. H. (2000) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.154.12.1226 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Armour, M., Parry, K., Manohar, N., Holmes, K., Ferfolja, T., Curry, C., MacMillan, F., & Smith, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Women's Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1161-1171
- ISSN
- 1059-7115 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9996
- 1931-843X
- OpenAlex
- W2951370690
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence and Academic Impact of Dysmenorrhea in 21,573 Young Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/jwh.2018.7615
- The paper
- Armour, M., Parry, K., Manohar, N., Holmes, K., Ferfolja, T., Curry, C., MacMillan, F., & Smith, C. A. (2019). The Prevalence and Academic Impact of Dysmenorrhea in 21,573 Young Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Women's Health. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.