Cited by 17LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHealth, Medicine and Society

Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Obergefell vs. Hodges Marriage Equality Decision

Open access
Perone, Angela K.·2015·LGBT Health

Abstract

The United States Supreme Court's Obergefell vs. Hodges groundbreaking marriage equality decision also created new terrain for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons regarding health, healthcare, and health benefits. This article addresses the health implications of this decision by examining its impact on minority stress and stigmatization and health-related benefits. It also includes a discussion of several impending issues affecting LGBT health that remain after Obergefell.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/lgbt.2015.0083

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The culturally traumatic denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples denied millions of sexual minorities access to important marriage-related flexible resources such as employer-sponsored health insurance and partner-inherited wealth.

    “the culturally traumatic denial of marriage rights (a valued cultural institution) to same sex couples denied millions of sexual minorities access to important marriage-related flexible resources (e.g., employer-sponsored health insurance, partner-inherited wealth)”

    From Cultural trauma as a fundamental cause of health disparities (2022) · cites this paper as Perone, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perone, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Perone, Angela K.
Venue
LGBT Health
Published
2015-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
196-199
ISSN
  • 2325-8292 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-8306
OpenAlex
W1523048375
Cited by
17
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • LGBT Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage, minority stress, stigmatization, health insurance coverage, health care access, Supreme Court decision
MeSH terms
Female, Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Humans, Male, Marriage, Minority Groups, Stereotyping, Stress, Psychological, Taxes, United States, Sexuality, Supreme Court Decisions, Health Status Disparities, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review