Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spinal Cord Injury Produced by Consistent Mechanical Displacement of the Cord in Rats: Behavioral and Histologic Analysis

BEHRMANN, DONALD L., BRESNAHAN, JACQUELINE C., BEATTIE, MICHAEL S., SHAH, BIVIC R.·1992·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

We examined the ability of an electromechanical device to produce consistent and incomplete thoracic (T9) spinal cord injuries in rats by brief displacement (Dspl) of the exposed dural surface. Open field walking, inclined plane, grid walking, and footprint analysis, and a determination of the percentage of tissue spared at the lesion center were used to assess chronic outcome (6 weeks postinjury). Laminectomy control animals showed no evidence of a functional deficit or histologic lesion. Complete spinal cord transections in normal rats and in a group of animals previously injured (1.1 mm Dspl) and allowed to recover resulted in complete loss of hindlimb function, demonstrating an important functional role for the remaining spared fibers at the lesion site. Consistent spinal cord displacements (0.80 mm, 0.95 mm, and 1.10 mm) resulted in behavioral groups with low outcome variability over a narrow range of incomplete recovery of neurologic function. Significant behavioral (open field walking, inclined plane, and grid walking) and histologic differences were found between the control and Dspl groups and between the 0.80 mm and 1.10 mm Dspl groups. Significant correlations were observed among the injury parameters, behavioral, and histologic scores. Open field walking and inclined plane performance were sensitive indicators of both the early and late phases of neurologic recovery. Grid walking was most useful in animals with small chronic residual deficits. The footprint analysis resulted in less significant correlations and differences between the behavioral groups than the other outcome measures. This may result from a relatively narrow range of sensitivity (open field walking scores between 3.3 and 4.0) and increased variability within the groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1992.9.197

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
BEHRMANN, D. L., BRESNAHAN, J. C., BEATTIE, M. S., & SHAH, B. R.
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1992-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
197-217
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1985075855
Cited by
244
References
0
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spinal Cord Injury Produced by Consistent Mechanical Displacement of the Cord in Rats: Behavioral and Histologic Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.1992.9.197
The paper
BEHRMANN, D. L., BRESNAHAN, J. C., BEATTIE, M. S., & SHAH, B. R. (1992). Spinal Cord Injury Produced by Consistent Mechanical Displacement of the Cord in Rats: Behavioral and Histologic Analysis. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1992.9.197

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.