The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Phase II Study of Moderate Hypothermia in Severe Brain Injury
Abstract
Forty-six patients with severe nonpenetrating brain injury [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 4-7] were randomized to standard management at 37 degrees C (n = 22) and to standard management with systemic hypothermia to 32 to 33 degrees C (n = 24). The two groups were balanced in terms of age (Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p > 0.95), randomizing GCS (chi-square test, p = 0.54), and primary diagnosis. Cooling was begun within 6 h of injury by use of cooling blankets. Metocurine and morphine were given hourly during induction and maintenance of hypothermia. Rewarming was at a rate of 1 degree C per 4 h beginning 48 h after intravascular temperature had reached 33 degrees C. Muscle relaxants and sedation were continued until core temperature reached 35 degrees C. There were no cardiac or coagulopathy-related complications. Seizure incidence was lower in the hypothermia group (Fisher's exact text, p = 0.019). Sepsis was seen more commonly in the hypothermia group, but difference was not statistically significant (chi-square test). Mean Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months after injury showed an absolute increase of 16% (i.e., 36.4-52.2%) in the number of patients in the Good Recovery/Moderate Disability (GR/MD) category as compared with Severe Disability/Vegetative/Dead (SD/V/D) (chi-square test, p > 0.287). Based on evidence of improved neurologic outcome with minimal toxicity, we believe that phase III testing of moderate systemic hypothermia in patients with severe head injury is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alzheimer's pathology in human temporal cortex surgically excised after severe brain injury
Ikonomovic, M. D., Uryu, K., Abrahamson, E. E., Ciallella, J. R., Trojanowski, J. Q., Lee, V. M.-Y., Clark, R. S., Marion, D. W., Wisniewski, S. R., & DeKosky, S. T. (2004) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.06.011 · Cited by 399
Cytokines and their receptors in the central nervous system: Physiology, pharmacology, and pathology
Rothwell, N. J., Luheshi, G., & Toulmond, S. (1996) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(95)02033-0 · Cited by 233
Is keeping cool still hot? An update on hypothermia in brain injury
Clifton, G. L. (2004) · Current Opinion in Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00075198-200404000-00007 · Cited by 62
Self-citationSpreading Depression Expands Traumatic Injury in Neocortical Brain Slices
Church, A. J., & Andrew, R. D. (2005) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2005.22.277 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- CLIFTON, G. L., ALLEN, S., BARRODALE, P., PLENGER, P., BERRY, J., KOCH, S., FLETCHER, J., HAYES, R. L., & CHOI, S. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-271
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2046934316
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.