The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Early Time-Dependent Decompression for Spinal Cord Injury: Vascular Mechanisms of Recovery
Abstract
Although surgical decompression is often advocated for acute spinal cord injury, the timing and efficacy of early treatment have not been clinically proven. Our objectives were to determine the importance of early spinal cord decompression on recovery of evoked potential conduction under precision loading conditions and to determine if regional vascular mechanisms could be linked to electrophysiologic recovery. Twenty-one mature beagles were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated to maintain normal respiratory and acid-base balance. Somatosensory-evoked potentials from the upper and lower extremities were measured at regular intervals. The spinal cord at T-13 was loaded dorsally under precision loading conditions until evoked potential amplitudes had been reduced by 50%. At this functional endpoint, spinal cord displacement was maintained for either 30 (n = 7), 60 (n = 8), or 180 min (n = 6). Spinal cord decompression was followed by a 3-h monitoring period. Regional spinal cord blood flow was measured with fluorescent microspheres at baseline (following laminectomy) immediately after stopping dynamic cord compression, 5, 15, and 180 min after decompression. Within 5 min after stopping dynamic compression, evoked potential signals were absent in all dogs. We observed somatosensory-evoked potential recovery in 6 of 7 dogs in the 30-min compression group, 5 of 8 dogs in the 60-min compression group, and 0 of 6 dogs in the 180-min compression group. Recovery in the 30- and 60-min groups varied significantly from the 180-min group (p < 0.05). Regional spinal cord blood flow at baseline, 21.4+/-2.2 ml/100/g/min (combined group mean +/- SE) decreased to 4.1+/-0.7 ml/100 g/min after stopping dynamic compression. Reperfusion flows after decompression were inversely related to duration of compression. Of the 7 dogs in the 30 min compression group, 5 min after decompression the blood flow was 49.1+/-3.1 ml/100 g/min, which was greater than two times baseline. In the 180-min compression group early post-decompression blood flow, 19.8+/-6.2 ml/100 g/min, was not significantly different than baseline. Of the 8 dogs in the 60-min compression group, 5 who recovered evoked potential conduction revealed a lower spinal cord blood flow sampled immediately after stopping dynamic compression, 2.1+/-0.4 ml/100 g/min, compared to the 3 who did not recover where blood flow was 8.4+/-2.1 ml/100 g/min (p < 0.05). Reperfusion flows measured as the interval change in blood flow between the time dynamic compression was stopped to 5, 15, or 180 min after decompression, were significantly greater in those dogs that recovered evoked potential function (p < 0.05). Three hours after decompression, spinal cord blood flow in the 3 dogs in the 60-min compression group with no recovery, 11.1+/-2.1 ml/100 g/min, was significantly less than the spinal cord blood flow of the recovered group (n = 5), 20.5+/-2.2 ml/100 g/min. These data illustrate the importance of early time-dependent events following precision dynamic spinal cord loading and sustained compression conditions. Spinal cord decompression performed within 1 h of evoked potential loss resulted in significant electrophysiologic recovery after 3 h of monitoring. This study showed that the degree of early reperfusion hyperemia after decompression was inversely proportional to the duration of spinal cord compression and proportional to electrophysiologic recovery. Residual blood flow during the sustained compression period was significantly higher in those dogs that did not recover evoked potential function after decompression suggesting a reperfusion injury. These results indicate that, after precise dynamic spinal cord loading to a point of functional conduction deficit (50% decline in evoked potential amplitude), a critical time period exists where intervention in the form of early spinal cord decompression can lead to effective recovery of electrophysiologic function in the 1- to 3-h post-decompression p
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ahuja, C. S., Wilson, J. R., Nori, S., Kotter, M. R. N., Druschel, C., Curt, A., & Fehlings, M. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 · Cited by 2,441
Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions
Hu, X., Xu, W., Ren, Y., Wang, Z., He, X., Huang, R., Ma, B., Zhao, J., Zhu, R., & Cheng, L. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01477-6 · Cited by 770
Spinal cord injury is accompanied by chronic progressive demyelination
Totoiu, M. O., & Keirstead, H. S. (2005) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20517 · Cited by 372
Furlan, J. C., Noonan, V., Cadotte, D. W., & Fehlings, M. G. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1147 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- CARLSON, G. D., MINATO, Y., OKADA, A., GORDEN, C. D., WARDEN, K. E., BARBEAU, J. M., BIRO, C. L., BAHNUIK, E., BOHLMAN, H. H., & LAMANNA, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 951-962
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2071303079
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Time-Dependent Decompression for Spinal Cord Injury: Vascular Mechanisms of Recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.1997.14.951
- The paper
- CARLSON, G. D., MINATO, Y., OKADA, A., GORDEN, C. D., WARDEN, K. E., BARBEAU, J. M., BIRO, C. L., BAHNUIK, E., BOHLMAN, H. H., & LAMANNA, J. C. (1997). Early Time-Dependent Decompression for Spinal Cord Injury: Vascular Mechanisms of Recovery. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1997.14.951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.