The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanical Properties of Dura Mater from the Rat Brain and Spinal Cord
Abstract
The dura mater is the outermost and most substantial meningial layer of central nervous system (CNS) tissue that acts as a protective membrane for the brain and spinal cord. In animal models of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, mechanical insults are often delivered directly to the dura to injure the underlying tissue. As such, including a description of the mechanical properties of dura mater is critical for biomechanical analyses of these models. We have characterized the mechanical response of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord in uniaxial tension. Testing was performed at low (0.0014 sec(-1)) and high (19.42 sec(-1)) strain rates. Both rat cranial dura and spinal dura demonstrated non-linear stress-strain responses characteristic of collagenous soft tissues. The non-linear increase in stress lagged in the spinal dura compared to the cranial dura. The slow rate data was fit to a one-term Ogden hyperelastic constitutive law, and significant differences were observed for the stiffness, G, and the parameter, alpha, which nominally introduces non-linearity. High strain rate stress-relaxation tests were performed to 10% strain, which was held for 10 sec. The relaxation was fit to a four-term Prony series exponential decay. Cranial dura and spinal dura demonstrated similar overall relaxation, but significant differences were identified in the distribution of the relaxation over the Prony series parameters, which demonstrated that cranial dura tended to relax faster. Polarized light microscopy revealed that the structural entities of spinal dura were aligned in the axial direction, whereas cranial dura did not demonstrate a preferential alignment. This was confirmed qualitatively with Masson's Tri-chrome and Verhoeff's Van Gieson staining for collagen and elastin, which also indicated greater elastin content for the spinal dura than for the cranial dura.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS OF BRAIN INJURY
Kraus, J. F., & McArthur, D. L. (1996) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70266-8 · Cited by 304
Cited by
Jakus, A. E., Secor, E. B., Rutz, A. L., Jordan, S. W., Hersam, M. C., & Shah, R. N. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01179 · Cited by 710
Conformable polyimide-based μECoGs: Bringing the electrodes closer to the signal source
Vomero, M., Porto Cruz, M. F., Zucchini, E., Ciarpella, F., Delfino, E., Carli, S., Boehler, C., Asplund, M., Ricci, D., Fadiga, L., et al. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120178 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Maikos, J. T., Elias, R. A. I., & Shreiber, D. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-51
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2014205765
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical Properties of Dura Mater from the Rat Brain and Spinal Cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/neu.2007.0348
- The paper
- Maikos, J. T., Elias, R. A. I., & Shreiber, D. I. (2008). Mechanical Properties of Dura Mater from the Rat Brain and Spinal Cord. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.0348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.