Cited by 65

CRISPR/Cas9 Nuclease-Mediated Gene Knock-In in Bovine-Induced Pluripotent Cells

Heo, Young Tae, Quan, Xiaoyuan, Xu, Yong Nan, Baek, Soonbong, Choi, Hwan, Kim, Nam-Hyung, Kim, Jongpil·2015·Stem Cells and Development

Abstract

Efficient and precise genetic engineering in livestock such as cattle holds great promise in agriculture and biomedicine. However, techniques that generate pluripotent stem cells, as well as reliable tools for gene targeting in livestock, are still inefficient, and thus not routinely used. Here, we report highly efficient gene targeting in the bovine genome using bovine pluripotent cells and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 nuclease. First, we generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from bovine somatic fibroblasts by the ectopic expression of yamanaka factors and GSK3β and MEK inhibitor (2i) treatment. We observed that these bovine iPSCs are highly similar to naïve pluripotent stem cells with regard to gene expression and developmental potential in teratomas. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease, which was specific for the bovine NANOG locus, showed highly efficient editing of the bovine genome in bovine iPSCs and embryos. To conclude, CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-mediated homologous recombination targeting in bovine pluripotent cells is an efficient gene editing method that can be used to generate transgenic livestock in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/scd.2014.0278

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using gene-editing in animals such as rats, cattle, sheep and pigs indicate that it is possible to delete or disable genes in an embryo-a simpler process than actually correcting DNA sequences-in only some of the cells.

    “Studies using gene-editing in animals such as rats 5 , cattle 6 , sheep 7 and pigs 8 , indicate that it is possible to delete or disable genes in an embryo - a simpler process than actually correcting DNA sequences - in only some of the cells.”

    From Don’t edit the human germ line (2015) · cites this paper as [6]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heo, Y. T., Quan, X., Xu, Y. N., Baek, S., Choi, H., Kim, N.-H., & Kim, J.
Venue
Stem Cells and Development
Published
2015-02
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
393-402
ISSN
  • 1547-3287
  • 1557-8534
Cited by
65
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review