CRISPR/Cas9 Nuclease-Mediated Gene Knock-In in Bovine-Induced Pluripotent Cells
Abstract
Efficient and precise genetic engineering in livestock such as cattle holds great promise in agriculture and biomedicine. However, techniques that generate pluripotent stem cells, as well as reliable tools for gene targeting in livestock, are still inefficient, and thus not routinely used. Here, we report highly efficient gene targeting in the bovine genome using bovine pluripotent cells and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 nuclease. First, we generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from bovine somatic fibroblasts by the ectopic expression of yamanaka factors and GSK3β and MEK inhibitor (2i) treatment. We observed that these bovine iPSCs are highly similar to naïve pluripotent stem cells with regard to gene expression and developmental potential in teratomas. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease, which was specific for the bovine NANOG locus, showed highly efficient editing of the bovine genome in bovine iPSCs and embryos. To conclude, CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-mediated homologous recombination targeting in bovine pluripotent cells is an efficient gene editing method that can be used to generate transgenic livestock in the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies using gene-editing in animals such as rats, cattle, sheep and pigs indicate that it is possible to delete or disable genes in an embryo-a simpler process than actually correcting DNA sequences-in only some of the cells.
“Studies using gene-editing in animals such as rats 5 , cattle 6 , sheep 7 and pigs 8 , indicate that it is possible to delete or disable genes in an embryo - a simpler process than actually correcting DNA sequences - in only some of the cells.”
From Don’t edit the human germ line (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · Cited by 3,495 · see citing works
The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Ying, Q.-L., Wray, J., Nichols, J., Batlle-Morera, L., Doble, B., Woodgett, J., Cohen, P., & Smith, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06968 · Cited by 3,442 · see citing works
Mali, P., Aach, J., Stranges, P. B., Esvelt, K. M., Moosburner, M., Kosuri, S., Yang, L., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2675 · Cited by 1,752 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Potential targets of CRISPR sgRNAs were identified as previously described (Mali et al., 2013) [29].”
Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system
Friedland, A. E., Tzur, Y. B., Esvelt, K. M., Colaiácovo, M. P., Church, G. M., & Calarco, J. A. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2532 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Don’t edit the human germ line
Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., Werner, M., & Smolenski, J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/519410a · Cited by 530 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heo, Y. T., Quan, X., Xu, Y. N., Baek, S., Choi, H., Kim, N.-H., & Kim, J.
- Venue
- Stem Cells and Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-402
- ISSN
- 1547-3287
- 1557-8534
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review