The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glycosaminoglycan Content of Small Intestinal Submucosa: A Bioscaffold for Tissue Replacement
Abstract
Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a resorbable biomaterial that induces tissue remodeling when used as a xenogeneic tissue graft in animal models of vascular, urologic, dermatologic, neurologic, and orthopedic injury. Determination of the composition and structure of naturally occurring biomaterials such as SIS that promote tissue remodeling is necessary for the greater understanding of their role in wound healing. Since glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are important components of extracellular matrix (ECM) and SIS is primarily an ECM-based material, studies were performed to identify the species of glycosaminoglycans present in SIS. Porcine SIS was chemically extracted and the extracts were analyzed for uronic acid. The extractable uronic acid content was determined to be 47.7 micromol/g (approximately 21 microg GAG/mg) of the dry weight of the SIS tissue. Using electrophoretic separation of GAGs on cellulose acetate membranes, hyaluronic acid, heparin, heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate A, and dermatan sulfate were identified. Digestion of specific GAGs with selective enzymes confirmed the presence of these GAG species. Two GAGs common to other tissues with large basement membrane ECM components, keratan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate C, were not detected in the SIS extracts. Identification of specific GAGs in the composition of the ECM-rich SIS provides a starting point toward a more comprehensive understanding of the structure and function of this naturally occurring biomaterial with favorable in vivo tissue remodeling properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids
Blumenkrantz, N., & Asboe-Hansen, G. (1973) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(73)90377-1 · Cited by 7,140
Yayon, A., Klagsbrun, M., Esko, J. D., Leder, P., & Ornitz, D. M. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90512-w · Cited by 2,440
Cited by
Decellularization of tissues and organs
Gilbert, T. W., Sellaro, T. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 · Cited by 2,222
Self-citationXenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction
Badylak, S. F. (2004) · Transplant Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.trim.2003.12.016 · Cited by 747
Self-citationMethods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance
Keane, T. J., Swinehart, I. T., & Badylak, S. F. (2015) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.005 · Cited by 670
Self-citationCollagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient
Abou Neel, E. A., Bozec, L., Knowles, J. C., Syed, O., Mudera, V., Day, R., & Hyun, J. K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010 · Cited by 296
Strategies for tissue and organ decellularization
Gilbert, T. W. (2012) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.24130 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodde, J. P., Badylak, S. F., Brightman, A. O., & Voytik-Harbin, S. L.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-217
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W2000216983
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.