Cited by 670Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance

Open access
Keane, Timothy J., Swinehart, Ilea T., Badylak, Stephen F.·2015·Methods

Abstract

Biologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are widely used in both preclinical animal studies and in many clinical applications to repair and reconstruct tissues. Recently, 3-dimensional ECM constructs have been investigated for use in whole organ engineering applications. ECM scaffolds are prepared by decellularization of mammalian tissues and the ECM provides natural biologic cues that facilitate the restoration of site appropriate and functional tissue. Preservation of the native ECM constituents (i.e., three-dimensional ultrastructure and biochemical composition) during the decellularization process would theoretically result in the ideal scaffold for tissue remodeling. However, all methods of decellularization invariably disrupt the ECM to some degree. Decellularization of tissues and organs for the production of ECM bioscaffolds requires a balance between maintaining native ECM structure and the removal of cellular materials such as DNA, mitochondria, membrane lipids, and cytosolic proteins. These remnant cellular components can elicit an adverse inflammatory response and inhibit constructive remodeling if not adequately removed. Many variables including cell density, matrix density, thickness, and morphology can affect the extent of tissue and organ decellularization and thus the integrity and physical properties of the resulting ECM scaffold. This review describes currently used decellularization techniques, and the effects of these techniques upon the host response to the material.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.005

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keane, T. J., Swinehart, I. T., & Badylak, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Badylak, Stephen F.
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
84
Pages
25-34
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078246403
Cited by
670
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DGE-1247842)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
extracellular matrix scaffolds, biological scaffolds, tissue remodeling, inflammation, decellularization methods
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Separation, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Materials Testing, Sterilization, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review