The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design Strategies of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Controlled Fiber Orientation
Open accessAbstract
Tissue engineering is an emerging area of applied research with a goal of repairing or regenerating the functions of damaged tissue that fails to heal spontaneously by using cells and synthetic functional components called scaffolds. Scaffolds made of nanofibers (herein called "nano-fibrous scaffolds") play a key role in the success of tissue engineering by providing a structural support for the cells to accommodate and guiding their growth in the three-dimensional space into a specific tissue. The orientation of these fibers is considered as one of the important features of a perfect tissue scaffold, because the fiber orientation greatly influences cell growth and related functions. Therefore, engineering scaffolds with a control over fiber orientation is essential and a prerequisite for controlling cell orientation and tissue growth. Recent advances in electrospinning have made it possible to create nano-featured scaffolds with controlled fiber orientation. Electrospinning is a straightforward, cost-effective, and versatile method, which is recently applied in engineering well-defined nano-fibrous scaffolds that hold promise in serving as a synthetic extra-cellular matrix (ECM). This article reviews the current trends in electrospinning nano-fibrous scaffolds with fiber orientation. A detailed mechanism involved in the spinning process is discussed, followed by experimental examples that show how the fiber orientation influences cellular growth behavior. This review is expected to be useful for readers to gain knowledge on the state-of-the-art of scaffold engineering by electrospinning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Cited by
Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: methods to form skeletal myotubes and their applications
Ostrovidov, S., Hosseini, V., Ahadian, S., Fujie, T., Parthiban, S. P., Ramalingam, M., Bae, H., Kaji, H., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0534 · Cited by 302
Self-citationRiggio, C., Calatayud, M. P., Giannaccini, M., Sanz, B., Torres, T. E., Fernández-Pacheco, R., Ripoli, A., Ibarra, M. R., Dente, L., Cuschieri, A., et al. (2014) · Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2013.12.008 · Cited by 112
Advances and prospects in biomimetic multilayered scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration
Fu, L., Yang, Z., Gao, C., Li, H., Yuan, Z., Wang, F., Sui, X., Liu, S., & Guo, Q. (2020) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbaa042 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Murugan, R., & Ramakrishna, S.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1845-1866
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W1969529086
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.