Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cross-Linking Electrospun Type II Collagen Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Carbodiimide in Ethanol

Barnes, Catherine P., Pemble, Charles W., Brand, David D., Simpson, David G., Bowlin, Gary L.·2007·Tissue Engineering

Abstract

In trying to assess the structural integrity of electrospun type II collagen scaffolds, a modified but new technique for cross-linking collagen has been developed. Carbodiimides have been previously used to cross-link collagen in gels and in lyophilized native tissue specimens but had not been used for electrospun mats until recently. This cross-linking agent, and in particular 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), is of extreme interest, especially for tissue-engineered scaffolds composed specifically of native polymers (e.g., collagen), because it is a zero-length cross-linking agent that has not been shown to cause any cytotoxic reactions. The unique aspect of the cross-linking protocol in this study involves the use of ethanol as the solvent for the cross-linking agent, because the pure collagen electrospun mats immediately disintegrate when placed in an aqueous solution. This study examines 2 concentrations of EDC with and without the addition of N-hydroxysuccinimide to the reaction (which has been shown to result in higher cross-linking yields in aqueous solutions) to test the hypothesis that the use of EDC in a nonaqueous solution will cross-link electrospun type II collagen fibrous matrices in a comparable manner to typical glutaraldehyde fixation protocols. The use of EDC is compared with the cross-linking effects of glutaraldehyde via mechanical testing (uniaxial tensile testing) and biochemical testing (analysis of the percentage of free amino groups). The stress-strain curves of the cross-linked samples demonstrated uniaxial tensile behavior more characteristic of native tissue than do the dry, untreated samples. The heated, 50% glutaraldehyde cross-linking protocol resulted in a mean peak stress of 0.76 MPa, a mean strain at break of 127.30%, and a mean tangential modulus of 0.89 MPa; mean values for the samples treated with the EDC protocols ranged from 0.35 to 0.60 MPa for peak stress, from 111.83 to 159.23% for strain at break, and from 0.57 to 0.92 MPa for tangential modulus. Low and high concentrations (20 mM and 200 mM, respectively) of EDC alone were comparable in extent of cross-linking (29% and 29%, respectively) to the heated 50% glutaraldehyde cross-linking protocol (30% cross-linked).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.2006.0292

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Barnes, C. P., Pemble, C. W., Brand, D. D., Simpson, D. G., & Bowlin, G. L.
Venue
Tissue Engineering
Published
2007-07
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1593-1605
ISSN
  • 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8690
OpenAlex
W2013035214
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Linking Electrospun Type II Collagen Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Carbodiimide in Ethanol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.2006.0292
The paper
Barnes, C. P., Pemble, C. W., Brand, D. D., Simpson, D. G., & Bowlin, G. L. (2007). Cross-Linking Electrospun Type II Collagen Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Carbodiimide in Ethanol. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0292

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.