The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair
Open accessAbstract
Articular cartilage injury and degeneration are leading causes of disability. Animal studies are critically important to developing effective treatments for cartilage injuries. This review focuses on the use of animal models for the study of the repair and regeneration of focal cartilage defects. Animals commonly used in cartilage repair studies include murine, lapine, canine, caprine, porcine, and equine models. There are advantages and disadvantages to each model. Small animal rodent and lapine models are cost effective, easy to house, and useful for pilot and proof-of-concept studies. The availability of transgenic and knockout mice provide opportunities for mechanistic in vivo study. Athymic mice and rats are additionally useful for evaluating the cartilage repair potential of human cells and tissues. Their small joint size, thin cartilage, and greater potential for intrinsic healing than humans, however, limit the translational value of small animal models. Large animal models with thicker articular cartilage permit study of both partial thickness and full thickness chondral repair, as well as osteochondral repair. Joint size and cartilage thickness for canine, caprine, and mini-pig models remain significantly smaller than that of humans. The repair and regeneration of chondral and osteochondral defects of size and volume comparable to that of clinically significant human lesions can be reliably studied primarily in equine models. While larger animals may more closely approximate the human clinical situation, they carry greater logistical, financial, and ethical considerations. A multifactorial analysis of each animal model should be carried out when planning in vivo studies. Ultimately, the scientific goals of the study will be critical in determining the appropriate animal model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hunziker, E. B. (2002) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1053/joca.2002.0801 · Cited by 1,975
Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage.
Shapiro, F., Koide, S., & Glimcher, M. J. (1993) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199304000-00009 · Cited by 1,253
Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis
Murphy, J. M., Fink, D. J., Hunziker, E. B., & Barry, F. P. (2003) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.11365 · Cited by 1,102
Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis: A First Estimate of Incidence, Prevalence, and Burden of Disease
Brown, T. D., Johnston, R. C., Saltzman, C. L., Marsh, J. L., & Buckwalter, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/01.bot.0000246468.80635.ef · Cited by 956
Yamada, K., Yazawa, K., Shimizu, A., Iwanaga, T., Hisashi, Y., Nuhn, M., O'Malley, P., Nobori, S., Vagefi, P. A., Patience, C., et al. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1172 · Cited by 610
McCormack, K., Wake, B., Perez, J., Fraser, C., Cook, J., McIntosh, E., Vale, L., & Grant, A. (2005) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta9140 · Cited by 578
Synthetic Polymers Seeded with Chondrocytes Provide a Template for New Cartilage Formation
Vacanti, C. A., Langer, R., Schloo, B., & Vacanti, J. P. (1991) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199111000-00001 · Cited by 547
Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knee.
Furukawa, T., Eyre, D. R., Koide, S., & Glimcher, M. J. (1980) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-198062010-00012 · Cited by 486
Serra, R., Johnson, M., Filvaroff, E. H., LaBorde, J., Sheehan, D. M., Derynck, R., & Moses, H. L. (1997) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.139.2.541 · Cited by 477
Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft?? C: 3-Year Clinical Results
Marcacci, M., Berruto, M., Brocchetta, D., Delcogliano, A., Ghinelli, D., Gobbi, A., Kon, E., Pederzini, L., Rosa, D., Sacchetti, G. L., et al. (2005) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000165737.87628.5b · Cited by 457
Cited by
Toward delivery of multiple growth factors in tissue engineering
Chen, F.-M., Zhang, M., & Wu, Z.-F. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.053 · Cited by 649
Collins, K. H., Herzog, W., MacDonald, G. Z., Reimer, R. A., Rios, J. L., Smith, I. C., Zernicke, R. F., & Hart, D. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00112 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, C. R., Szczodry, M., & Bruno, S.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-115
- ISSN
- 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-3376
- OpenAlex
- W2024376207
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452
- The paper
- Chu, C. R., Szczodry, M., & Bruno, S. (2010). Animal Models for Cartilage Regeneration and Repair. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.