The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft?? C: 3-Year Clinical Results
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The use of tissue engineering for cartilage repair has emerged as a potential therapeutic option and has led to the development of Hyalograft C, a tissue-engineered graft composed of autologous chondrocytes grown on a scaffold entirely made of HYAFF 11, an esterified derivative of hyaluronic acid. Here we present the results of an ongoing multicenter clinical study conducted with the primary objective to investigate the subjective symptomatic, functional and health-related quality of life outcomes of patients treated with Hyalograft C. Clinical results on the cohort of 141 patients with followup assessments ranging from 2 to 5 years (average followup time: 38 months), are reported. At followup 91.5% of patients improved according to the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective evaluation; 76% and 88% of patients had no pain and mobility problems respectively assessed by the EuroQol-EQ5D measure. Furthermore, 95.7% of the patients had their treated knee normal or nearly normal as assessed by the surgeon; cartilage repair was graded arthroscopically as normal or nearly normal in 96.4% of the scored knees; the majority of the second-look biopsies of the grafted site histologically were assessed as hyaline-like. Importantly, a very limited complication rate was recorded in this study. The positive clinical results obtained indicate that Hyalograft C is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
Jagur‐Grodzinski, J. (2006) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.729 · Cited by 394
Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation
Marlovits, S., Zeller, P., Singer, P., Resinger, C., & Vécsei, V. (2006) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.009 · Cited by 388
Dermal Matrices and Bioengineered Skin Substitutes: A Critical Review of Current Options
Debels, H., Hamdi, M., Abberton, K., & Morrison, W. (2015) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000000219 · Cited by 227
Cell delivery therapeutics for musculoskeletal regeneration☆
Nöth, U., Rackwitz, L., Steinert, A. F., & Tuan, R. S. (2010) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2010.04.004 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcacci, M., Berruto, M., Brocchetta, D., Delcogliano, A., Ghinelli, D., Gobbi, A., Kon, E., Pederzini, L., Rosa, D., Sacchetti, G. L., Stefani, G., & Zanasi, S.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- &NA;
- Issue
- 435
- Pages
- 96-105
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127324240
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft?? C: 3-Year Clinical Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.blo.0000165737.87628.5b
- The paper
- Marcacci, M., Berruto, M., Brocchetta, D., Delcogliano, A., Ghinelli, D., Gobbi, A., Kon, E., Pederzini, L., Rosa, D., Sacchetti, G. L., Stefani, G., & Zanasi, S. (2005). Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft?? C: 3-Year Clinical Results. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000165737.87628.5b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.