Cited by 41Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicinebiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Biomaterials-Driven Sterile Inflammation

Open access
Chen, Henry, Agrawal, Devendra K., Thankam, Finosh G.·2022·Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews

Abstract

Performance of the biomaterials used for regenerative medicine largely depends on biocompatibility; however, the biological mechanisms underlying biocompatibility of a biomaterial within the host system is poorly understood. In addition to the classical immune response against non-self-entities, the sterile inflammatory response could limit the compatibility of biological scaffolds. Whereas the immediate to short-term host response to a biomaterial implant have been characterized, the long-term progression of host–biomaterial relationship has not been described. This article explores the novel concept of biomaterials-driven sterile inflammation (BSI) in long-term biodegradable implants and throws light for possible explanation for the onset of BSI and the associated damage-associated molecular patterns. The understanding of BSI would advance the current strategies to improve biomaterial–host tissue integration and open novel translational avenues in biomaterials-based tissue regeneration. Impact statement: Understanding the novel concept of biomaterials-driven sterile inflammation and associated damage-associated molecular patterns in long-term biodegradable implants would determine their success and improves the tissue engineering and regenerative strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0253

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both in vitro and in vivo experiments show that PLCL maintains good histocompatibility after implantation and usually only triggers a mild, acute local inflammatory response that is self-limiting within a short period.

    “Both in vitro and in vivo experiments show that PLCL maintains good histocompatibility after implantation, usually only triggers a mild, acute local inflammatory response, which is part of the normal wound healing process and is self-limiting within a short period of time [31, 32].”
  • PLCL materials usually do not trigger severe immune responses or chronic inflammatory responses when degraded in vivo.

    “Therefore, PLCL materials usually do not trigger severe immune responses or chronic inflammatory responses when degraded in vivo.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 41

Authors
Chen, H., Agrawal, D. K., & Thankam, F. G.
Affiliations
Western University of Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Thankam, Finosh G.
Venue
Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Published
2022-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
22-34
ISSN
  • 1937-3368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-3376
OpenAlex
W3104389398
Cited by
41
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
biocompatibility, biodegradable implants, long-term implantation, damage-associated molecular patterns, tissue regeneration, biological scaffolds
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Inflammation, Prostheses and Implants, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review