Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Analyses of Survival and Prognostic Factors and the Role of Radiation Therapy in Local Control

BRIERLEY, J., TSANG, R., SIMPSON, W.J., GOSPODAROWICZ, M., SUTCLIFFE, S., PANZARELLA, T.·1996·Thyroid

Abstract

Records of 73 patients with medullary thyroid cancer were reviewed to assess prognostic factors and the role of external beam radiation therapy. Patients were treated between 1954 and 1992. The median age was 49 years (range 15-85), M:F ratio 1.6:1, and the median follow-up was 7.9 years. (2.5-34.6). The primary tumor size was < 1 cm in 10%, 1-4 cm in 53%, and > 4 cm in 37%. Multifocality was noted in 32%, and 23% had metastasis at presentation. Eight patients presented with inoperable tumors, 40% had gross, and 37% microscopic residual disease postthyroidectomy. Extraglandular extension was present in 56%, and 74% had pathologically involved lymph nodes. Treatment was by total or near total thyroidectomy in 41 patients; 37 had a lymph node dissection. Forty-six patients were irradiated, the dose of radiation ranging from 20 to 75.5 Gy; median was 40 Gy, treatment time median was 28 days and the median number of fractions was 20. The overall cause specific survival (CSS) was 70% and 57% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the following factors predicted for lower CSS: age as a continuous variable (p = 0.003), male gender (p = 0.008), presence of distant metastasis (p < 0.0001), lymph node involvement (p = 0.03), gross residual disease (p < 0.0001), tumor size > 4 cm (p = 0.05), extraglandular invasion (p < 0.004), vascular invasion (p = 0.007), diarrhea (p < .0007), and abnormal postoperative calcitonin (p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis only two factors were significant: the presence of extraglandular invasion, and postoperative gross residual disease. There was no difference in local/regional relapse free rate between patients receiving external radiation and those that did not, but in 40 high risk patients (microscopic residual disease, extraglandular invasion, or lymph node involvement), the local/regional relapse free rate was 86% at 10 years with postoperative external beam radiation (25 patients), and 52% for those with no postoperative external radiation (p = 0.049). To optimize local/regional tumor control, we therefore continue to advise external beam radiation in patients at high risk of local/regional relapse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.1996.6.305

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
BRIERLEY, J., TSANG, R., SIMPSON, W. J., GOSPODAROWICZ, M., SUTCLIFFE, S., & PANZARELLA, T.
Venue
Thyroid
Published
1996-08
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
305-310
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2084191984
Cited by
278
References
0
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Analyses of Survival and Prognostic Factors and the Role of Radiation Therapy in Local Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.1996.6.305
The paper
BRIERLEY, J., TSANG, R., SIMPSON, W. J., GOSPODAROWICZ, M., SUTCLIFFE, S., & PANZARELLA, T. (1996). Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Analyses of Survival and Prognostic Factors and the Role of Radiation Therapy in Local Control. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.1996.6.305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.