Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Features Associated with an Increased Risk of Thyroid Malignancy in Patients with Follicular Neoplasia by Fine-Needle Aspiration

TUTTLE, R. MICHAEL, LEMAR, HOMER, BURCH, HENRY B.·1998·Thyroid

Abstract

The application of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to the evaluation of the thyroid nodule has greatly enhanced the ability of the clinician to appropriately select patients for thyroidectomy. However, despite extensive experience with thyroid FNA, the cytological distinction of benign from malignant follicular neoplasia remains problematic. As a result, most patients with FNA findings of a follicular neoplasm are referred for thyroidectomy. The goal of the present study was to develop clinical criteria capable of predicting malignancy in patients with an FNA diagnosis of follicular neoplasm. Among 1121 patients undergoing thyroid FNA at two large teaching centers during the period 1990 to 1995, 149 patients had cytological findings consistent with a follicular neoplasm. Among 103 patients referred for thyroidectomy, 22 (21%) were found to have a malignancy in the biopsied nodule. Among patients subjected to thyroidectomy, the risk of malignancy was significantly higher when follicular neoplasia was present in a male (43% vs. 16% for females, p = 0.007), when the nodule was greater than 4 cm to palpation (40% vs. 13% for nodules less than 4 cm, p = 0.03), or when the nodule was judged to be solitary by palpation (25% vs. 6% for a dominant nodule in a multinodular goiter, p = 0.02). Bayesian analysis of the data reveals that after an FNA showing a follicular neoplasm, the risk of malignancy in males with large nodules was nearly 80%, compared with a rate of only 3% in females with small nodules. These results suggest that clinical features including gender, nodule size, and character of the gland by palpation can be systematically integrated into the decision analysis, thereby improving the selection of patients for surgical referral.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.1998.8.377

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
TUTTLE, R. M., LEMAR, H., & BURCH, H. B.
Venue
Thyroid
Published
1998-05
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
377-383
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2035919693
Cited by
286
References
1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.