The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Value of Repeated Fine Needle Aspirations of the Thyroid: An Analysis of Over Ten Thousand FNAs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has been accepted as the diagnostic method of choice in the initial evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, the value of repeated FNAs in the long-term follow-up of lesions initially diagnosed as benign is being questioned. Do the findings on initial FNA really spare patients thyroidectomy or do they only postpone it? The purpose of the present study is our attempt to answer this question. DESIGN: Retrospective review of cytology reports of patients who underwent thyroidal FNAs at Washington Hospital Center from January 1998 through April 2006. All statistical analyses were done using the statistical package Splus. MAIN OUTCOME: Patients who had thyroid nodules diagnosed as benign on FNA performed at our institution had a 90% probability of a benign diagnosis (with 95% confidence interval [0.87, 0.92]), when they underwent surgery. When the benign cytologic diagnosis was confirmed on a repeat aspiration, this probability increased to 98% (with 95% confidence interval [0.94, 1.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated thyroidal FNAs yielding benign diagnoses are nearly always accurate (98%), and therefore the patients can be followed safely without undergoing surgery, unless an unfavorable clinical change occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
A Large Multicenter Correlation Study of Thyroid Nodule Cytopathology and Histopathology
Wang, C.-C. C., Friedman, L., Kennedy, G. C., Wang, H., Kebebew, E., Steward, D. L., Zeiger, M. A., Westra, W. H., Wang, Y., Khanafshar, E., et al. (2011) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2010.0243 · Cited by 362
Na, D. G., Lee, J. H., Jung, S. L., Kim, J.-H., Sung, J. Y., Shin, J. H., Kim, E.-K., Lee, J. H., Kim, D. W., Park, J. S., et al. (2012) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.117 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Oertel, Y. C., Miyahara-Felipe, L., Mendoza, M. G., & Yu, K.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1061-1066
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2085373657
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value of Repeated Fine Needle Aspirations of the Thyroid: An Analysis of Over Ten Thousand FNAs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2007.0159
- The paper
- Oertel, Y. C., Miyahara-Felipe, L., Mendoza, M. G., & Yu, K. (2007). Value of Repeated Fine Needle Aspirations of the Thyroid: An Analysis of Over Ten Thousand FNAs. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2007.0159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.