Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus Statement on the Terminology and Classification of Central Neck Dissection for Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Surgery Working Group with Participation from the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons, American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society

Open access
Carty, Sally E., Cooper, David S., Doherty, Gerard M., Duh, Quan-Yang, Kloos, Richard T., Mandel, Susan J., Randolph, Gregory W., Stack, Brendan C., Steward, David L., Terris, David J., Thompson, Geoffrey B., Tufano, Ralph P., Tuttle, R. Michael, Udelsman, Robert·2009·Thyroid

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary goals of this interdisciplinary consensus statement are to review the relevant anatomy of the central neck compartment, to identify the nodal subgroups within the central compartment commonly involved in thyroid cancer, and to define a consistent terminology relevant to the central compartment neck dissection. SUMMARY: The most commonly involved central lymph nodes in thyroid carcinoma are the prelaryngeal (Delphian), pretracheal, and the right and left paratracheal nodal basins. A central neck dissection includes comprehensive, compartment-oriented removal of the prelaryngeal and pretracheal nodes and at least one paratracheal lymph node basin. A designation should be made as to whether a unilateral or bilateral dissection is performed and on which side (left or right) in unilateral cases. Lymph node "plucking" or "berry picking" implies removal only of the clinically involved nodes rather than a complete nodal group within the compartment and is not recommended. A therapeutic central compartment neck dissection implies that nodal metastasis is apparent clinically (preoperatively or intraoperatively) or by imaging (clinically N1a). A prophylactic/elective central compartment dissection implies nodal metastasis is not detected clinically or by imaging (clinically N0). CONCLUSION: Central neck dissection at a minimum should consist of removal of the prelaryngeal, pretracheal, and paratracheal lymph nodes. The description of a central neck dissection should include both the indication (therapeutic vs. prophylactic/elective) and the extent of the dissection (unilateral or bilateral).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2009.0159

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
Carty, S. E., Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Duh, Q.-Y., Kloos, R. T., Mandel, S. J., Randolph, G. W., Stack, B. C., Steward, D. L., Terris, D. J., Thompson, G. B., Tufano, R. P., Tuttle, R. M., & Udelsman, R.
Venue
Thyroid
Published
2009-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1153-1158
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W1574663596
Cited by
609
References
2
FWCI
21.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Statement on the Terminology and Classification of Central Neck Dissection for Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Surgery Working Group with Participation from the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons, American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2009.0159
The paper
Carty, S. E., Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Duh, Q.-Y., Kloos, R. T., Mandel, S. J., Randolph, G. W., Stack, B. C., Steward, D. L., Terris, D. J., Thompson, G. B., Tufano, R. P., Tuttle, R. M., & Udelsman, R. (2009). Consensus Statement on the Terminology and Classification of Central Neck Dissection for Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Surgery Working Group with Participation from the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons, American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, and American Head and Neck Society. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.0159

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.