The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To address terminology and other issues related to thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) hosted The NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference. The conclusions regarding terminology and morphologic criteria from the NCI meeting led to the Bethesda Thyroid Atlas Project and form the framework for the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. DESIGN: Participants of the Atlas Project were selected from among the committee members of the NCI FNA State of the Science Conference and other participants at the live conference. The terminology framework was based on a literature search of English language publications dating back to 1995 using PubMed as the search engine; online forum discussions ( http://thyroidfna.cancer.gov/forums/default.aspx ); and formal interdisciplinary discussions held on October 22 and 23, 2007, in Bethesda, MD. MAIN OUTCOME: For clarity of communication, the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology recommends that each report begin with one of the six general diagnostic categories. Each of the categories has an implied cancer risk that links it to an appropriate clinical management guideline. CONCLUSIONS: The project participants hope that the adoption of this framework will facilitate communication among cytopathologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and radiologists; facilitate cytologic-histologic correlation for thyroid diseases; facilitate research into the understanding of thyroid diseases; and allow easy and reliable sharing of data from different laboratories for national and international collaborative studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shin, J. H., Baek, J. H., Chung, J., Ha, E. J., Kim, J.-H., Lee, Y. H., Lim, H. K., Moon, W.-J., Na, D. G., Park, J. S., et al. (2016) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.370 · Cited by 889
Moon, W.-J., Baek, J. H., Jung, S. L., Kim, D. W., Kim, E. K., Kim, J. Y., Kwak, J. Y., Lee, J. H., Lee, J. H., Lee, Y. H., et al. (2011) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2011.12.1.1 · Cited by 473
Faquin, W. C., Wong, L. Q., Afrogheh, A. H., Ali, S. Z., Bishop, J. A., Bongiovanni, M., Pusztaszeri, M. P., VandenBussche, C. J., Gourmaud, J., Vaickus, L. J., et al. (2016) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.21631 · Cited by 311
Self-citationfor the German Societies of General and Visceral Surgery; Endocrinology; Nuclear Medicine; Pathology; Radiooncology; Oncological Hematology; and the German Thyroid Cancer Patient Support Organization Ohne Schilddrüse leben e.V., Dralle, H., Musholt, T. J., Schabram, J., Steinmüller, T., Frilling, A., Simon, D., Goretzki, P. E., Niederle, B., Scheuba, C., et al. (2013) · Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00423-013-1057-6 · Cited by 279
Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS)
Kwak, J. Y. (2013) · Journal of Korean Thyroid Association · doi:10.11106/jkta.2013.6.2.106 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Cibas, E. S., & Ali, S. Z.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1159-1165
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W3021493465
- Cited by
- 1,261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/thy.2009.0274
- The paper
- Cibas, E. S., & Ali, S. Z. (2009). The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.0274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.