Cited by 105Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Misdiagnosis of Graves' Disease with Apparent Severe Hyperthyroidism in a Patient Taking Biotin Megadoses

Barbesino, Giuseppe·2016·Thyroid®

Abstract

Background: Accurate immunoassays measuring minute quantities of hormones are the cornerstone of the practice of endocrinology. Despite tremendous advances in this field, novel pitfalls in these tests emerge from time to time. Oral biotin can interfere with immunoassays of several hormones. The purpose of this report is to relate an extreme case of such interference. Patient findings: A patient with progressive multiple sclerosis was found to have extremely elevated free thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and suppressed thyrotropin (TSH) levels. His TSH receptor binding inhibiting antibody level was also elevated. This constellation of laboratory findings suggested a diagnosis of severe Graves' disease. All of the assays yielding abnormal results employed the biotin–streptavidin affinity in their design. The patient had no symptoms of hyperthyroidism, and detailed review of his medications revealed intake of megadoses of biotin. Temporary discontinuation of biotin treatment resulted in complete resolution of the biochemical abnormalities. Conclusions: Non-physiologic biotin supplementation may interfere with several immunoassays, including thyroid hormones, TSH, thyroglobulin, and TSH receptor binding inhibiting antibody, leading to erroneous diagnoses. Questioning for biotin intake should be part of the evaluation for patients undergoing endocrine tests. Interruption of biotin supplementation for at least two days prior to biotin-sensitive tests should be sufficient to avoid major misdiagnoses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2015.0664

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbesino, G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Barbesino, Giuseppe
Venue
Thyroid®
Published
2016-06
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
860-863
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W2396241021
Cited by
105
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
19.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thyroid (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Massachusetts General Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
Graves' disease, biotin interference, immunoassay interference, free thyroxine, triiodothyronine, TSH suppression, thyroglobulin, multiple sclerosis, biotin supplementation, laboratory test interference
MeSH terms
Biotin, Diagnostic Errors, Graves Disease, Humans, Hyperthyroidism, Male, Middle Aged, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Triiodothyronine, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review