The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Definition and Evaluation of Telemedicine
Abstract
Issues related to the definition and evaluation of telemedicine are articulated as a basis for conducting theoretically based, empirically sound, and policy-relevant evaluation. This paper includes a proposed operational definition of telemedicine, a discussion of the role of telemedicine in the healthcare system and economic analysis of telemedicine, an analysis of the basic approaches and requirements for telemedicine evaluation, and an identification of basic issues for evaluation. Telemedicine is conceived of as an integrated system of health-care delivery that employs telecommunications and computer technology as a substitute for face-to-face contact between provider and client. It has the potential for ameliorating seemingly intractable problems in healthcare such as limited access to care among segments in the population--especially the geographically disadvantaged--uneven quality of care, and cost inflation. Its true merit has yet to be determined by systematic empirical study. Such study should include a clear and precise identification of inputs and output and the nature of the relations between them, an assessment of the changes that might occur in the process of care as a consequence to telemedicine, and, ultimately, an evaluation of the effects of telemedicine on the healthcare system in terms of cost, quality, and accessibility. Several basic questions regarding the effects of telemedicine are posed as potential hypotheses for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699 · Cited by 707
Telemedicine: A New Health Care Delivery System
Bashshur, R. L., Reardon, T. G., & Shannon, G. W. (2000) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.613 · Cited by 318
Self-citationThe Substitution of Digital Images for Dermatologic Physical Examination
Kvedar, J. C. (1997) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1997.03890380031005 · Cited by 187
The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor–patient communication
Miller, E. A. (2003) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/135763303321159611 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- BASHSHUR, R. L.
- Venue
- Telemedicine Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-30
- ISSN
- 1078-3024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002007924
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Definition and Evaluation of Telemedicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.19
- The paper
- BASHSHUR, R. L. (1995). On the Definition and Evaluation of Telemedicine. Telemedicine Journal. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.