Cited by 62Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationEar Surgery and Otitis Media

The feasibility of a community-based mobile telehealth screening service for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in Australia

Elliott, Galen, Smith, Anthony C., Bensink, Mark E., Brown, Cecil, Stewart, Christine, Perry, Chris, Scuffham, Paul·2010·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Objective:The increasing prevalence and earlier onset of chronic health conditions amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people has become a concerning and significant problem. Telehealth may be a useful application for the early detection, monitoring, and treatment of chronic diseases such as ear disease and vision impairment. This study evaluates whether it is feasible to integrate a mobile telemedicine-enabled ear and eye–screening service with existing community-based services for Australian indigenous children.Materials and Methods:A collaborative service was established with the local community and delivered from a van fitted with screening equipment and telemedicine capabilities. Indigenous children (0–16 years) were assessed at school by an aboriginal health worker for conditions impacting hearing and vision. Screening data and video-otoscopic images were uploaded to a database and made accessible to specialists via a secure Web site. Those children who failed an ear-screening assessment, tele-otology clinics were conducted remotely by an ear, nose, and throat specialist, who reviewed cases and provided a diagnosis and treatment plan. Similarly, children who failed vision assessments were referred to an optometrist for follow-up care.Results:During the first 6 months, the service visited 12 of the 16 schools in the region, screening 442 of the 760 consented children (58%). Of the 183 (41%) children who failed ear screening, 59 were reviewed remotely by an ear, nose, and throat surgeon, with 9 children booked for surgery. Three hundred and four or 41% of the consenting children completed an eye assessment, in which 46 (15%) failed and required referral to the optometrist.Conclusions:It is feasible to integrate a mobile telehealth screening service with existing community-based services to provide specialist review and treatment planning at a distance. Community consultation, engagement, and collaboration in all areas of the project have been important. A collaborative service was established with the local community of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This service was provided from a mobile van outfitted with screening equipment and telemedicine capabilities. Indigenous children (0–16 years) were assessed at school by an Aboriginal health worker for conditions that impact hearing and vision. Screenings were conducted on 442 children who attended 1 of 12 schools in the region. Of the 183 (41%) children who failed ear screening, 59 were reviewed remotely by a specialist ear, nose, and throat surgeon with 9 children booked for surgery. Three hundred four completed an eye assessment, in which 46 (15%) failed and required referral to the optometrist. The utility of a mobile telehealth screening service with existing community-based services to provide specialist review and treatment planning at a distance was effectively demonstrated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2010.0045

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A community-based tele-health screening service for indigenous children in Australia focusing on ENT conditions had a 76% acceptance rate by the indigenous community and tele-medicine was a useful tool in assessment and management of ENT conditions.

    “The research concluded there was a 76% acceptance rate by the indigenous community, measured by the number of parents who consented for their children to be screened, and that tele-medicine was a useful tool in the assessment and management of ENT conditions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, G., Smith, A. C., Bensink, M. E., Brown, C., Stewart, C., Perry, C., & Scuffham, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Smith, Anthony C.
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2010-11
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
950-956
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2088845262
Cited by
62
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Keywords
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, mobile telemedicine, hearing screening, vision screening, ear diseases, video otoscopy, school-based screening, community-based care, Indigenous health, chronic disease prevention, feasibility study, teleconsultation, Indigenous health workers, New South Wales
MeSH terms
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Adolescent, Australia, Child, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Community Health Services, Cooperative Behavior, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hearing Disorders, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mass Screening, Otolaryngology, Prevalence, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review