Cited by 41Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyElectronic Health Records Systems

Disruptive Innovation: The Future of Healthcare?

Yellowlees, Peter, Odor, Alberto, Patrice, Kesha, Parish, Michelle Burke, Nafiz, Najia, Iosif, Ana-Maria, Hilty, Donald·2011·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

The traditional face-to-face doctor–patient relationship is the core of conventional medical practice. One key aspect of this changing relationship is the increasing dependency on asynchronous data collection in clinical consultations. Such electronic communications and data streams may be numeric, text-based, audio, digitized still pictures, video and radiologic, as well as emanating from multiple medical devices. While asynchronous medicine may be established in specialties like radiology and dermatology, there is little research regarding the use of asynchronous medicine in areas of medicine that traditionally rely on the physical doctor–patient interaction such as primary care, internal medicine, geriatrics, and psychiatry. The practice of psychiatry stands out as a discipline that is highly dependent on the quality of the physical meeting between the doctor and the patient, yet even in this specialty it is possible to utilize asynchronous medicine for some types of psychiatric consultations. Asynchronous medicine has the potential to be significantly disruptive to our current healthcare processes, as well as more clinically and economically efficient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2010.0130

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yellowlees, P., Odor, A., Patrice, K., Parish, M. B., Nafiz, N., Iosif, A.-M., & Hilty, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Yellowlees, Peter
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2011-04
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
231-234
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2036974492
Cited by
41
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
disruptive innovation, physician-patient relationship, psychiatric consultation, telepsychiatry, electronic health data, medical consultation, primary care, health care efficiency
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Nurse Practitioners, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review