Effects of Home Telemonitoring to Support Improved Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of a home telemonitoring technology on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in terms of care satisfaction, patient empowerment, improved quality of life, and utilization of hospital and home care. Design: A quasi-experimental retrospective and prospective design was developed with a matched control group to compare the effects of telemonitoring (the experimental group, n = 23) with the traditional homecare offering (the control group, n = 23). Measurements: Satisfaction, patient empowerment, and quality of life were measured using validated Likert scales, whereas the data on care utilization were collected from the participating patients' medical record. Results: Mixed results were observed. The clinical effects of home telemonitoring were very positive in terms of patients' satisfaction and empowerment. The perceptions of care providers as well as those of patients were congruent in this respect. Also, the study suggests that telemonitoring may have a positive effect on quality of life for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. In contrast, the results were disappointing in terms of resource savings for the use of both homecare and hospital care. Conclusion: Capturing the full potential of these new technologies will require a much more fundamental reorganization of work than just a simple deployment of the technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
4 (44%) of the 9 studies showed no difference in satisfaction when compared with a comparator.
“whereas 44% (4/9) [30,43,44,95] showed no difference when compared with a comparator.”
From Interactive Remote Patient Monitoring Devices for Managing Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Sicotte, C., Paré, G., Morin, S., Potvin, J., & Moreault, M.-P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- Center in Health and Social Services of Grand Littoral
- Corresponding author
- Sicotte, Claude
- Venue
- Telemedicine and e-Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-103
- ISSN
- 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3669
- OpenAlex
- W2075860956
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- home health monitoring, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, patient satisfaction, patient empowerment, quality of life, home care utilization, hospital utilization, resource conservation, telemedicine
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Patient Care, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Power, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Social Support, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review