Cited by 65Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effects of Home Telemonitoring to Support Improved Care for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases

Sicotte, Claude, Paré, Guy, Morin, Sandra, Potvin, Jacques, Moreault, Marie-Pierre·2011·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of a home telemonitoring technology on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in terms of care satisfaction, patient empowerment, improved quality of life, and utilization of hospital and home care. Design: A quasi-experimental retrospective and prospective design was developed with a matched control group to compare the effects of telemonitoring (the experimental group, n = 23) with the traditional homecare offering (the control group, n = 23). Measurements: Satisfaction, patient empowerment, and quality of life were measured using validated Likert scales, whereas the data on care utilization were collected from the participating patients' medical record. Results: Mixed results were observed. The clinical effects of home telemonitoring were very positive in terms of patients' satisfaction and empowerment. The perceptions of care providers as well as those of patients were congruent in this respect. Also, the study suggests that telemonitoring may have a positive effect on quality of life for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. In contrast, the results were disappointing in terms of resource savings for the use of both homecare and hospital care. Conclusion: Capturing the full potential of these new technologies will require a much more fundamental reorganization of work than just a simple deployment of the technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2010.0142

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 65

Authors
Sicotte, C., Paré, G., Morin, S., Potvin, J., & Moreault, M.-P.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
  • Center in Health and Social Services of Grand Littoral
Corresponding author
Sicotte, Claude
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2011-03
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
95-103
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2075860956
Cited by
65
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
home health monitoring, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, patient satisfaction, patient empowerment, quality of life, home care utilization, hospital utilization, resource conservation, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Patient Care, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Power, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Social Support, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review