Cited by 28Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Direct to Consumer Mobile Teledermatology Apps: An Exploratory Study

Open access
Kochmann, Matthias, Locatis, Craig·2016·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2012, "Direct to Consumer" mobile teledermatology apps have become more available, relinquishing many data collection tasks normally done by healthcare professionals directly to patients. INTRODUCTION: To determine user friendliness, diagnostic quality, and service of commercially available mobile teledermatology apps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All mobile teledermatology apps available at the Apple App Store were reviewed. The two most popular mobile teledermatology apps were identified and tested together with three apps having similar functionality using a single case of a patient who was also examined by a dermatologist in-person. RESULTS: Apps varied in diagnostic scope, data gathering methods, services, rendered results, and in geographic coverage and cost. DISCUSSION: None of the apps take a history as thoroughly as recommended by textbooks. Key medical questions like current medications and allergies are not asked often. Most apps rendered concordant results, except for the one having the least thorough history taking. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile teledermatology application interfaces, services, and cost vary, with some risking medical errors and possible distribution of continuity of care. The American Telemedicine Association's guidelines for teledermatology need to address the use of direct to consumer apps. To protect consumers, app regulation, certification, or guidelines suggesting appropriate development and use might be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2015.0189

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kochmann, M., & Locatis, C.
Affiliations
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kochmann, Matthias
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2016-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
689-693
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2294840239
Cited by
28
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
user interface usability, diagnostic accuracy, medical history, continuity of care, app regulation, consumer protection, telemedicine guidelines, App Store
MeSH terms
Dermatology, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review