Cited by 17Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsWorkplace Health and Well-beingDigital Mental Health Interventions

Health Applications for Corporate Health Management

Steigner, Guido, Doarn, Charles R., Schütte, Michael, Matusiewicz, David, Thielscher, Christian·2017·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many corporate organizations around the world are looking at new ways to improve the health and well-being of their employees. Many have begun to use m-health approaches and unique applications (apps) to provide assistance. In Germany, both m-health and occupational health management (OHM) are growing quickly. Therefore, we hypothesized that the combination-apps usage in OHM-is growing as well. We studied the usage of health apps in large corporations for health management of employed individuals. METHODS: To understand the environment in Germany, a two-part study was conducted. First, an extensive literature search was done and second, interviews were conducted with 12 of the 20 biggest companies' health management representatives. RESULTS: Using key search terms, 5,445 peer-reviewed journal articles traced with German databases and on PubMed were reviewed. Interestingly and somewhat surprising to the authors, none of them covered our specific topic. Interviews were conducted with 60% of the companies indicated. Only 3 out of 12 companies use apps. Four companies are piloting apps. With one exception, apps cover well-known areas such as food coaching, physical motion, smoking cessation, stress prevention, and other health-related subjects. One app used sensors in work clothing to prevent unhealthy motion. With a few exceptions, there has been no evaluation of the utility and utilization of apps. DISCUSSION: Current app usage in corporate health management in Germany is surprisingly low. Apps need to be better evaluated. Main obstacles-which could be resolved in the future-are legal restrictions (especially on data security), the lack of company-owned smart phones, misfit of apps and corporate health strategy, a lack of app evaluation, and high app prices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2016.0162

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steigner, G., Doarn, C. R., Schütte, M., Matusiewicz, D., & Thielscher, C.
Affiliations
  • FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management (DE)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Thielscher, Christian
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2017-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
448-452
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2557079196
Cited by
17
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
corporate health management, occupational health management, health apps, mobile health, employee well-being, data security, app evaluation, stress prevention, smoking cessation, Germany
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Female, Germany, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Professional Corporations, Occupational Health, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review