Cited by 32Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

Specialist Perspectives on Ontario Provincial Electronic Consultation Services

Keely, Erin, Williams, Rob, Epstein, Gilad, Afkham, Amir, Liddy, Clare·2019·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Background: Wait times to access specialist care remain a huge frustration for patients and providers. In Ontario, two electronic consultation (eConsult) services provide prompt, secure access to specialist advice: The Champlain Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation (BASE™) eConsult-managed service, and the Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN). Introduction: To gain a broader understanding of specialists' perspectives providing eConsult services, we surveyed all specialists actively participating in either platform. Methods: A 34-item web questionnaire focused in four key areas (experience with the service, ideas for provincial expansion, recommendations for enhancements to the service, and specialist demographics) was sent to all specialists who had completed at least one eConsult on either service. Results: There was a 66% (114/172) response rate for BASE and a 47% (61/130) response rate for OTN. The most frequent motivations for participating in eConsult were innovative patient care (58% and 69%), opportunity to reduce wait times (45% and 54%), and opportunity to communicate directly with primary care providers (41% and 51%). Most specialists agreed that eConsult is feasible, results in improved communication between providers, and can be integrated into their clinical workflow without difficulty. Fifty-two percent of OTN specialists and 49% of BASE specialists agreed that they were appropriately compensated for answering eConsults. Discussion: Specialists participate in eConsult services to improve communication with primary care, provide innovative care, and reduce wait times. Conclusions: As eConsult services expand across regions and provinces, the provider perspectives and experiences should be used to evaluate the benefits of eConsult and impact on provider satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2018.0012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Champlain BASE eConsult service has grown from a small proof-of-concept to a fully implemented regional service, with a solid body of evidence supporting its ability to improve access to specialist advice, reduce wait times, lower costs, and deliver high levels of patient and provider satisfaction.

    “First launched in 2009, this innovative service has grown from a small proof-of-concept to a fully implemented regional service, with a solid body of evidence supporting its ability to improve access to specialist advice, reduce wait times, lower costs, and deliver high levels of patient and provider satisfaction [8–10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keely, E., Williams, R., Epstein, G., Afkham, A., & Liddy, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Ontario Telemedicine Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Champlain Local Health Integration Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Liddy, Clare
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2019-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W2800679892
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement
  • Champlain Local Health Integration Network
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-consultation, access to specialist care, waiting time, specialist perspectives, clinical workflow integration, provider compensation, provider satisfaction, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Medicine, Middle Aged, Motivation, Ontario, Patient Care Team, Specialization, Waiting Lists, Remote Consultation, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review